Why Does This Keep Happening? Assessing Theoretical Correlates Among Recurrent Victims Compared to Single and Non-Victims

Although the consequences of recurrent victimization-or experiencing more than one victimization-are substantial, a comprehensive understanding of how recurrent victims may differ from single and non-victims has not been established. The goal of this study was to use multiple victimological perspectives collectively to advance current theoretical knowledge on what predicts recurrent victimization, when controlling for theoretically relevant factors. Using data from a 2022 national survey, "risky" lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence theory indicators were assessed to predict recurrent victimization compared to single and non-victimization. Analyses found one risk factor-impulsivity-to be significant across models, indicating its importance in predicting recurrent victimization more generally. Other indicators (e.g., deviant peers, adverse childhood experience score, and disability status), however, were unique in predicting recurrent victimization compared to single victimization or non-victimization. Providing valuable insights into which theoretical factors may be important in differentiating recurrent victims from single and non-victims, these findings expand our understanding of why some victims are targeted more than once.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368856
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Does This Keep Happening? Assessing Theoretical Correlates Among Recurrent Victims Compared to Single and Non-Victims

Teresa C. Kulig, Amber E. Krushas, Leah C. Butler
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Why Does This Keep Happening? Assessing Theoretical Correlates Among Recurrent Victims Compared to Single and Non-Victims

Teresa C. Kulig, Amber E. Krushas, Leah C. Butler
article en

Abstract

Although the consequences of recurrent victimization-or experiencing more than one victimization-are substantial, a comprehensive understanding of how recurrent victims may differ from single and non-victims has not been established. The goal of this study was to use multiple victimological perspectives collectively to advance current theoretical knowledge on what predicts recurrent victimization, when controlling for theoretically relevant factors. Using data from a 2022 national survey, "risky" lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence theory indicators were assessed to predict recurrent victimization compared to single and non-victimization. Analyses found one risk factor-impulsivity-to be significant across models, indicating its importance in predicting recurrent victimization more generally. Other indicators (e.g., deviant peers, adverse childhood experience score, and disability status), however, were unique in predicting recurrent victimization compared to single victimization or non-victimization. Providing valuable insights into which theoretical factors may be important in differentiating recurrent victims from single and non-victims, these findings expand our understanding of why some victims are targeted more than once.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.