The Effect of a Third In-Ear Microphone on User Satisfaction, Speech Intelligibility, and the Real-Ear Gain of Hearing Aids at a Conversational Level in Patients with Moderate Hearing Loss

<b>Background:</b> The microphone & receiver-in-ear (M&RIE) integrates two traditional hearing aid microphones, while an additional in-ear microphone helps preserve natural sound perception. However, the impact of this third microphone on hearing aid amplification remains unclear in patients with moderate hearing loss. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective crossover study, thirty-nine participants with moderate hearing loss and no prior hearing-aid use were randomly assigned to be sequentially fitted with both traditional and M&RIE receivers. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) and word recognition score (WRS) were assessed. Audiological amplification was evaluated using real-ear measurements to determine whether a third in-ear microphone limits real-ear gain. <b>Results:</b> WRSs and APHAB scores showed no significant differences between the standard and M&RIE receivers. In addition, real-ear measurements across all frequencies and earplug types revealed no significant differences in real-ear insertion gain between the two receivers at a conversational level (65 dB SPL). <b>Conclusions:</b> The M&RIE provides amplification comparable to that of the standard receiver while preserving natural sound cues without significant audiological disadvantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196791
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of a Third In-Ear Microphone on User Satisfaction, Speech Intelligibility, and the Real-Ear Gain of Hearing Aids at a Conversational Level in Patients with Moderate Hearing Loss

Jinsei Jung, Seong Hoon Bae, Sang Hyun Kwak, Dongchul Cheon et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

The Effect of a Third In-Ear Microphone on User Satisfaction, Speech Intelligibility, and the Real-Ear Gain of Hearing Aids at a Conversational Level in Patients with Moderate Hearing Loss

Jinsei Jung, Seong Hoon Bae, Sang Hyun Kwak, Dongchul Cheon, Daeyoung Kim
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The microphone & receiver-in-ear (M&RIE) integrates two traditional hearing aid microphones, while an additional in-ear microphone helps preserve natural sound perception. However, the impact of this third microphone on hearing aid amplification remains unclear in patients with moderate hearing loss. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective crossover study, thirty-nine participants with moderate hearing loss and no prior hearing-aid use were randomly assigned to be sequentially fitted with both traditional and M&RIE receivers. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) and word recognition score (WRS) were assessed. Audiological amplification was evaluated using real-ear measurements to determine whether a third in-ear microphone limits real-ear gain. <b>Results:</b> WRSs and APHAB scores showed no significant differences between the standard and M&RIE receivers. In addition, real-ear measurements across all frequencies and earplug types revealed no significant differences in real-ear insertion gain between the two receivers at a conversational level (65 dB SPL). <b>Conclusions:</b> The M&RIE provides amplification comparable to that of the standard receiver while preserving natural sound cues without significant audiological disadvantages.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Yonsei University (KR), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), Korea Pharma (South Korea) (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.