Managing Psychosocial Health Risks in the Australian Construction Industry: A Holistic Hazard Management Intervention

This study presents a case study of a holistic, psychosocial hazard management intervention program in a project-based, remote workforce in the Australian construction industry. There is a dearth of research on targeted, integrative, multi-level wellbeing interventions, and we seek to address this gap. Given the high rates of psychological distress and suicide in construction, understanding these hazards and the responses needed to manage them is critical for prevention. Data were collected from workers before and after the implementation of an intervention using an empirically validated measure of the work environment underpinned by the job demands–resources framework to evaluate exposure to psychosocial hazards, and mental health indicators, including psychological distress and suicidal ideation. Results revealed that job demands and resources improved following the change initiative, and workers reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress compared to workers on similarly diverse remote sites. The findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions addressing specific workplace psychosocial risks that adopt a holistic approach to change across all levels of an organisation. The study contributes to a nuanced understanding of psychosocial risks in construction and informs strategies to mitigate mental health harms in high-risk occupational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Psychosocial Health Risks in the Australian Construction Industry: A Holistic Hazard Management Intervention

Keith Townsend, Nicholas Thompson, Stephen J. Page, Ashlea Kellner et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Managing Psychosocial Health Risks in the Australian Construction Industry: A Holistic Hazard Management Intervention

Keith Townsend, Nicholas Thompson, Stephen J. Page, Ashlea Kellner, A.P. Robertson, Rebecca Jane Loudoun, Amanda Biggs, Jemima Mason
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a case study of a holistic, psychosocial hazard management intervention program in a project-based, remote workforce in the Australian construction industry. There is a dearth of research on targeted, integrative, multi-level wellbeing interventions, and we seek to address this gap. Given the high rates of psychological distress and suicide in construction, understanding these hazards and the responses needed to manage them is critical for prevention. Data were collected from workers before and after the implementation of an intervention using an empirically validated measure of the work environment underpinned by the job demands–resources framework to evaluate exposure to psychosocial hazards, and mental health indicators, including psychological distress and suicidal ideation. Results revealed that job demands and resources improved following the change initiative, and workers reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress compared to workers on similarly diverse remote sites. The findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions addressing specific workplace psychosocial risks that adopt a holistic approach to change across all levels of an organisation. The study contributes to a nuanced understanding of psychosocial risks in construction and informs strategies to mitigate mental health harms in high-risk occupational settings.

BuildingsVol. 15(19)
Griffith University (AU), Government of the Northern Territory (AU)
Griffith University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.