Effectiveness of Plyometrics Versus Resistance Training Using Multigym on Lower Limb Musculature and Jump Performance Among Recreational Volleyball Players

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of plyometric training versus multigym resistance training on lower limb strength (measured by 1RM quadriceps and 1RM hamstrings) and jump performance (measured by the Sargent jump test) among recreational volleyball players. Background: Volleyball demands strong and explosive lower limb performance due to frequent jumping and rapid movements. Plyometric and resistance training are commonly used to enhance lower limb power and strength, yet limited research directly compares their effects in recreational volleyball players. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating both training methods over a structured intervention period. Participants: Ninety male recreational volleyball players aged 18-25 years were recruited and equally divided into two groups: 45 players in the plyometric training group and 45 players in the multigym resistance training group. Methodology: The plyometric training group performed a program consisting of a 10-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of lower limb plyometric exercises, and a 5-minute cool-down. The multigym resistance training group followed a similar structure with resistance exercises targeting the quadriceps and hamstrings. Both groups trained regularly for 12 weeks, after which post-test measurements were recorded. Analysis: Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted to evaluate improvements in lower limb strength (1RM quadriceps and hamstrings) and jump performance (Sargent jump test). Comparative analyses between the two groups determined the relative effectiveness of each training program. Results: The plyometric training group showed significantly greater improvements in jump performance compared to the multigym resistance training group. In contrast, the multigym resistance training group demonstrated significantly greater gains in lower limb strength. Conclusion: Both training methods enhanced physical performance in recreational volleyball players. Plyometric training was superior for improving jump performance, while multigym resistance training was more effective for increasing lower limb strength. Training programs should therefore be tailored to match the specific performance goals of athletes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr25920200728
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Plyometrics Versus Resistance Training Using Multigym on Lower Limb Musculature and Jump Performance Among Recreational Volleyball Players

A. Viswanath Reddy, K. Madhavi, A Srikanth, V Sameeraj
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effectiveness of Plyometrics Versus Resistance Training Using Multigym on Lower Limb Musculature and Jump Performance Among Recreational Volleyball Players

A. Viswanath Reddy, K. Madhavi, A Srikanth, V Sameeraj
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of plyometric training versus multigym resistance training on lower limb strength (measured by 1RM quadriceps and 1RM hamstrings) and jump performance (measured by the Sargent jump test) among recreational volleyball players. Background: Volleyball demands strong and explosive lower limb performance due to frequent jumping and rapid movements. Plyometric and resistance training are commonly used to enhance lower limb power and strength, yet limited research directly compares their effects in recreational volleyball players. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating both training methods over a structured intervention period. Participants: Ninety male recreational volleyball players aged 18-25 years were recruited and equally divided into two groups: 45 players in the plyometric training group and 45 players in the multigym resistance training group. Methodology: The plyometric training group performed a program consisting of a 10-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of lower limb plyometric exercises, and a 5-minute cool-down. The multigym resistance training group followed a similar structure with resistance exercises targeting the quadriceps and hamstrings. Both groups trained regularly for 12 weeks, after which post-test measurements were recorded. Analysis: Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted to evaluate improvements in lower limb strength (1RM quadriceps and hamstrings) and jump performance (Sargent jump test). Comparative analyses between the two groups determined the relative effectiveness of each training program. Results: The plyometric training group showed significantly greater improvements in jump performance compared to the multigym resistance training group. In contrast, the multigym resistance training group demonstrated significantly greater gains in lower limb strength. Conclusion: Both training methods enhanced physical performance in recreational volleyball players. Plyometric training was superior for improving jump performance, while multigym resistance training was more effective for increasing lower limb strength. Training programs should therefore be tailored to match the specific performance goals of athletes.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.