Canadian Sharia: A Semi‐Autonomous Social Field

ABSTRACT Drawing on ethnographic and archival research conducted in a “sharia court” ( dar ul‐iftaa ) in Canada, we argue these religiously binding legal institutions supplement provincial courts by providing a necessary service to pious Muslim women: religiously authorized divorce. Drawing on and developing Sally Falk Moore's concept of the semi‐autonomous social field, we suggest that dar ul‐iftaas in Canada are shaped by three significant forces: a particular variant of Hanafi divorce law, women's need for religious divorce, and the broader Canadian legal landscape. Attending to practices of adjudication in dar ul‐iftaas therefore provides a new perspective on contemporary practices of legal pluralism and on the place of religious law in a multicultural state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.70026
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canadian Sharia: A Semi‐Autonomous Social Field

Katherine Lemons, Rehan Sayeed, Halima Bensaid
PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review
Islamic Studies and History
article

Canadian Sharia: A Semi‐Autonomous Social Field

Katherine Lemons, Rehan Sayeed, Halima Bensaid
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on ethnographic and archival research conducted in a “sharia court” ( dar ul‐iftaa ) in Canada, we argue these religiously binding legal institutions supplement provincial courts by providing a necessary service to pious Muslim women: religiously authorized divorce. Drawing on and developing Sally Falk Moore's concept of the semi‐autonomous social field, we suggest that dar ul‐iftaas in Canada are shaped by three significant forces: a particular variant of Hanafi divorce law, women's need for religious divorce, and the broader Canadian legal landscape. Attending to practices of adjudication in dar ul‐iftaas therefore provides a new perspective on contemporary practices of legal pluralism and on the place of religious law in a multicultural state.

PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology ReviewVol. 48(2)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.