On The Future Of African Philosophy As An Academic Discipline

This paper offers an attempt at a working conception of African philosophy, one that draws from more than twenty-five years of teaching courses in both African philosophy and American philosophy at several American universities. Indeed, sixty years ago, the battle for and against definitional precision and clarity dominated the debate in African philosophy academic circles. On the one hand, the proponents of the definitional thesis seemed convinced of the superiority of universalism over particularism to the point of subscribing to the need for a transcendent definition of philosophy. From calls for a so-called scientific or technical definition of African philosophy emerged several somewhat absurd and parochial discourses from thinkers who subscribed, perhaps in good faith, to what they deemed to be the scientific and/or analytic nature of philosophy. To these well-meaning scholars, mostly trained at Western universities, philosophy appeared to be synonymous with its modes of production and/or, in some cases, even its modes of transmission. Indeed, for example, while some of them valued the so-called “argumentation and clarification” methods of some Western schools of thought over the universal human need for reflection on the fundamental questions of existence and the worldviews they entailed, others subscribed, instead, to a Kantian conception of philosophy, which they held as containing the necessary and sufficient conditions for distinguishing between philosophical and non-philosophical discourses. On the other hand, those thinkers, who rejected all attempts at definitional precision and clarity, appeared also to succumb to the temptation to count all Africanist projects as philosophical. In this paper, we emphasize the need for a progressive definition, which may be able to avoid the excesses of precision and clarity and, at the same time, recognize the complexity and diversity of the African philosophies without indulging in the need for inclusion at all costs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Science
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56734/ijahss.v6n9as1
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On The Future Of African Philosophy As An Academic Discipline

Tamba Nlandu
International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Science
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

On The Future Of African Philosophy As An Academic Discipline

Tamba Nlandu
article en

Abstract

This paper offers an attempt at a working conception of African philosophy, one that draws from more than twenty-five years of teaching courses in both African philosophy and American philosophy at several American universities. Indeed, sixty years ago, the battle for and against definitional precision and clarity dominated the debate in African philosophy academic circles. On the one hand, the proponents of the definitional thesis seemed convinced of the superiority of universalism over particularism to the point of subscribing to the need for a transcendent definition of philosophy. From calls for a so-called scientific or technical definition of African philosophy emerged several somewhat absurd and parochial discourses from thinkers who subscribed, perhaps in good faith, to what they deemed to be the scientific and/or analytic nature of philosophy. To these well-meaning scholars, mostly trained at Western universities, philosophy appeared to be synonymous with its modes of production and/or, in some cases, even its modes of transmission. Indeed, for example, while some of them valued the so-called “argumentation and clarification” methods of some Western schools of thought over the universal human need for reflection on the fundamental questions of existence and the worldviews they entailed, others subscribed, instead, to a Kantian conception of philosophy, which they held as containing the necessary and sufficient conditions for distinguishing between philosophical and non-philosophical discourses. On the other hand, those thinkers, who rejected all attempts at definitional precision and clarity, appeared also to succumb to the temptation to count all Africanist projects as philosophical. In this paper, we emphasize the need for a progressive definition, which may be able to avoid the excesses of precision and clarity and, at the same time, recognize the complexity and diversity of the African philosophies without indulging in the need for inclusion at all costs.

International Journal of Arts Humanities & Social ScienceVol. 06(Special Issue)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.