Regime-Specific interdependencies in cryptocurrency markets: A high-frequency GMM-VAR approach

In this study, we examined the regime-dependent dynamics and interrelationships among major cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Monero (XMR), using high-frequency one-minute data from January 2020 to April 2025. To capture the presence of latent structural shifts without assuming Markovian transitions, we employed a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which flexibly clustered distributions into two, empirically distinct regimes. Regime-specific Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models were then estimated to analyze interdependencies, spillovers, and shock transmission mechanisms across these digital assets. In the calm regime, the return dynamics were primarily self-driven, with limited cross-asset responses. Conversely, the volatile regime exhibited stronger and more persistent interlinkages, with BTC consistently acting as the principal transmitter of shocks to ETH and XMR, while ETH acts as a secondary transmitter, whereas XMR remains largely a risk recipient, absorbing external shocks with limited feedback into the system. These findings were corroborated through impulse response functions and forecast error variance decompositions, which consistently revealed asymmetric interdependence structures across the regimes. The Granger causality indicated more stable and statistically significant causal relationships in the calm regime than in the volatile regime. Furthermore, the Bai-Perron structural break tests confirmed the absence of significant deterministic breaks in the return series, reinforcing the validity of the GMM-based regime identification. These findings have practical implications for investors, regulators, and risk managers when modeling contagion and developing risk management strategies in cryptocurrency markets, especially during periods of heightened volatility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data Science in Finance and Economics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3934/dsfe.2025017
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regime-Specific interdependencies in cryptocurrency markets: A high-frequency GMM-VAR approach

Prashant Joshi
3 citations
Data Science in Finance and Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
article

Regime-Specific interdependencies in cryptocurrency markets: A high-frequency GMM-VAR approach

Prashant Joshi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this study, we examined the regime-dependent dynamics and interrelationships among major cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Monero (XMR), using high-frequency one-minute data from January 2020 to April 2025. To capture the presence of latent structural shifts without assuming Markovian transitions, we employed a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which flexibly clustered distributions into two, empirically distinct regimes. Regime-specific Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models were then estimated to analyze interdependencies, spillovers, and shock transmission mechanisms across these digital assets. In the calm regime, the return dynamics were primarily self-driven, with limited cross-asset responses. Conversely, the volatile regime exhibited stronger and more persistent interlinkages, with BTC consistently acting as the principal transmitter of shocks to ETH and XMR, while ETH acts as a secondary transmitter, whereas XMR remains largely a risk recipient, absorbing external shocks with limited feedback into the system. These findings were corroborated through impulse response functions and forecast error variance decompositions, which consistently revealed asymmetric interdependence structures across the regimes. The Granger causality indicated more stable and statistically significant causal relationships in the calm regime than in the volatile regime. Furthermore, the Bai-Perron structural break tests confirmed the absence of significant deterministic breaks in the return series, reinforcing the validity of the GMM-based regime identification. These findings have practical implications for investors, regulators, and risk managers when modeling contagion and developing risk management strategies in cryptocurrency markets, especially during periods of heightened volatility.

Data Science in Finance and EconomicsVol. 5(3)
Saint Martin's University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.