Modeling Pain Dynamics and Opioid Response in Oncology Inpatients: A Retrospective Study with Application to AI-Guided Analgesic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Cancer pain continues to be a major clinical problem nowadays. This study aims to evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder effectiveness in patients with colorectal cancer and develop machine learning models to predict treatment response for precision pain management. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> In a retrospective observational study, a total of 107 oncological patients were analyzed, with a detailed subgroup analysis of 42 patients with colorectal cancer, hospitalized between July and September in 2022. The pain assessment used numerical rating scales at baseline and 2-3 weeks follow-up. Clinical variables included demographics, disease staging, metastatic patterns, analgesic progression, and medication usage. Machine learning algorithms (e.g., Random Forest, CatBoost, XGBoost, and Neural Network) were used to predict pain reduction outcomes. The UMAP dimensionality reduction and clustering identified the patient phenotypes. <i>Results:</i> Statistical analyses included descriptive methods, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, and the models' performance was evaluated by AUC. Among patients with colorectal cancer, 73.8% achieved clinically pain improvement, with a mean reduction of 2.62 points and median improvement of 3.00 points. The metastatic site significantly affected outcomes: visceral metastases patients showed median improvement of 3.00 points with high variability, patients with bone metastases demonstrated heterogeneous responses (range: -2.00 to +8.00 points), while non-metastatic patients exhibited consistent improvement. Random Forest achieved optimal predictive performance (AUC: 0.9167), identifying the baseline pain score, bone metastases, Fentanyl usage, anticonvulsants, and antispasmodics as key predictive features. The clustering analysis revealed two distinct phenotypes, requiring different analgesic intensities. <i>Conclusions:</i> This study validates the WHO analgesic ladder effectiveness while demonstrating superior outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. The machine learning models successfully predict the treatment response with excellent discriminative ability, supporting precision medicine implementation in cancer pain management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101741
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Pain Dynamics and Opioid Response in Oncology Inpatients: A Retrospective Study with Application to AI-Guided Analgesic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

Mihai Vasile Marinca, Vladimir Poroch, Cosmin Dascalu, Eliza-Maria Froicu et al.
2 citations
Medicina
Pain Management and Opioid Use
4.38
article

Modeling Pain Dynamics and Opioid Response in Oncology Inpatients: A Retrospective Study with Application to AI-Guided Analgesic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

Mihai Vasile Marinca, Vladimir Poroch, Cosmin Dascalu, Eliza-Maria Froicu, Teodora Alexa‐Stratulat, Lucian Miron, Gema Bacoanu, Bogdan Gafton, Ioana Creangă-Murariu, Vlad-Adrian Afrăsânie, Irina Afrăsânie, Oriana-Maria Onicescu, Diana-Maria Pușcașu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Cancer pain continues to be a major clinical problem nowadays. This study aims to evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder effectiveness in patients with colorectal cancer and develop machine learning models to predict treatment response for precision pain management. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> In a retrospective observational study, a total of 107 oncological patients were analyzed, with a detailed subgroup analysis of 42 patients with colorectal cancer, hospitalized between July and September in 2022. The pain assessment used numerical rating scales at baseline and 2-3 weeks follow-up. Clinical variables included demographics, disease staging, metastatic patterns, analgesic progression, and medication usage. Machine learning algorithms (e.g., Random Forest, CatBoost, XGBoost, and Neural Network) were used to predict pain reduction outcomes. The UMAP dimensionality reduction and clustering identified the patient phenotypes. <i>Results:</i> Statistical analyses included descriptive methods, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, and the models' performance was evaluated by AUC. Among patients with colorectal cancer, 73.8% achieved clinically pain improvement, with a mean reduction of 2.62 points and median improvement of 3.00 points. The metastatic site significantly affected outcomes: visceral metastases patients showed median improvement of 3.00 points with high variability, patients with bone metastases demonstrated heterogeneous responses (range: -2.00 to +8.00 points), while non-metastatic patients exhibited consistent improvement. Random Forest achieved optimal predictive performance (AUC: 0.9167), identifying the baseline pain score, bone metastases, Fentanyl usage, anticonvulsants, and antispasmodics as key predictive features. The clustering analysis revealed two distinct phenotypes, requiring different analgesic intensities. <i>Conclusions:</i> This study validates the WHO analgesic ladder effectiveness while demonstrating superior outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. The machine learning models successfully predict the treatment response with excellent discriminative ability, supporting precision medicine implementation in cancer pain management.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Semmelweis University (HU), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Institutul Regional de Oncologie (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.