Foundation Models for Cybersecurity: A Comprehensive Multi-Modal Evaluation of TabPFN and TabICL for Tabular Intrusion Detection

While traditional ensemble methods have dominated tabular intrusion detection systems (IDSs), recent advances in foundation models present new opportunities for enhanced cybersecurity applications. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-modal evaluation of foundation models—specifically TabPFN (Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network), TabICL (Tabular In-Context Learning), and large language models—against traditional machine learning approaches across three cybersecurity datasets: CIC-IDS2017, N-BaIoT, and CIC-UNSW. Our rigorous experimental framework addresses critical methodological challenges through model-appropriate evaluation protocols and comprehensive assessment across multiple data variants. Results demonstrate that foundation models achieve superior and more consistent performance compared with traditional approaches, with TabPFN and TabICL establishing new state-of-the-art results across all datasets. Most significantly, these models uniquely achieve non-zero recall across all classes, including rare threats like Heartbleed and Infiltration, while traditional ensemble methods—despite achieving >99% overall accuracy—completely fail on several minority classes. TabICL demonstrates particularly strong performance on CIC-IDS2017 (99.59% accuracy), while TabPFN maintains consistent performance across all datasets, suggesting robust generalization capabilities. Both foundation models achieve these results using only fractions of the available training data and requiring no hyperparameter tuning, representing a paradigm shift toward training-light, hyperparameter-free adaptive IDS architectures, where TabPFN requires no task-specific fitting and TabICL leverages efficient in-context adaptation without retraining. Cross-dataset validation reveals that foundation models maintain performance advantages across diverse threat landscapes, while traditional methods exhibit significant dataset-specific variations. These findings challenge the cybersecurity community’s reliance on tree-based ensembles and demonstrate that foundation models offer superior capabilities for next-generation intrusion detection systems in IoT environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14193792
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foundation Models for Cybersecurity: A Comprehensive Multi-Modal Evaluation of TabPFN and TabICL for Tabular Intrusion Detection

J. de Curtò, Carlos T. Calafate, I. de Zarzà, Juan‐Carlos Cano et al.
2 citations
Electronics
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
2.97
article

Foundation Models for Cybersecurity: A Comprehensive Multi-Modal Evaluation of TabPFN and TabICL for Tabular Intrusion Detection

J. de Curtò, Carlos T. Calafate, I. de Zarzà, Juan‐Carlos Cano, Pablo García
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While traditional ensemble methods have dominated tabular intrusion detection systems (IDSs), recent advances in foundation models present new opportunities for enhanced cybersecurity applications. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-modal evaluation of foundation models—specifically TabPFN (Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network), TabICL (Tabular In-Context Learning), and large language models—against traditional machine learning approaches across three cybersecurity datasets: CIC-IDS2017, N-BaIoT, and CIC-UNSW. Our rigorous experimental framework addresses critical methodological challenges through model-appropriate evaluation protocols and comprehensive assessment across multiple data variants. Results demonstrate that foundation models achieve superior and more consistent performance compared with traditional approaches, with TabPFN and TabICL establishing new state-of-the-art results across all datasets. Most significantly, these models uniquely achieve non-zero recall across all classes, including rare threats like Heartbleed and Infiltration, while traditional ensemble methods—despite achieving >99% overall accuracy—completely fail on several minority classes. TabICL demonstrates particularly strong performance on CIC-IDS2017 (99.59% accuracy), while TabPFN maintains consistent performance across all datasets, suggesting robust generalization capabilities. Both foundation models achieve these results using only fractions of the available training data and requiring no hyperparameter tuning, representing a paradigm shift toward training-light, hyperparameter-free adaptive IDS architectures, where TabPFN requires no task-specific fitting and TabICL leverages efficient in-context adaptation without retraining. Cross-dataset validation reveals that foundation models maintain performance advantages across diverse threat landscapes, while traditional methods exhibit significant dataset-specific variations. These findings challenge the cybersecurity community’s reliance on tree-based ensembles and demonstrate that foundation models offer superior capabilities for next-generation intrusion detection systems in IoT environments.

ElectronicsVol. 14(19)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), Universidad Pontificia Comillas (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.