Autonomic Function Tests in Diabetic Hypertensive and Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients: A Case-Control Study

Background and Objective: Autonomic neuropathy, particularly cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, is a common complication in individuals with long-standing hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Both conditions are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Although autonomic dysfunction has been extensively studied in diabetes and in hypertension separately, the comparative assessment of autonomic dysfunction between diabetic hypertensive and non-diabetic hypertensive patients remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate and compare cardiovascular autonomic functions in diabetic hypertensive (DH) and non-diabetic hypertensive (NDH) individuals using standard clinical autonomic function tests, thus providing insights into the extent and patterns of autonomic impairment in each group.Methods: This study included 260 participants split into two groups: 130 DH patients (cases) and 130 NDH patients (controls), matched for age, sex, and duration of hypertension. Data on baseline clinical characteristics, including body mass index (BMI), duration of hypertension, glycemic control, and comorbidities, were recorded. Standard cardiovascular autonomic function tests were performed, including the heart rate response to deep breathing (HRDB), Valsalva maneuver (Valsalva ratio), orthostatic blood pressure changes, handgrip test, and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Statistical comparisons were made using univariate and multivariate analyses to account for covariates such as age, sex, and body mass index.Results: The DH group showed significantly lower HRDB and HRV indices than the NDH group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the drop in systolic blood pressure upon standing was more pronounced in the DH group, while the Valsalva ratio was decreased to a similar extent in both groups, suggesting a significant parasympathetic impairment in DH participants. Duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control (higher HbA1c), and longer duration of hypertension were significantly correlated with impaired autonomic function.Conclusion: Diabetic hypertensive patients exhibit more pronounced abnormalities in cardiovascular autonomic control when compared to non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Comprehensive autonomic function testing should be considered in routine clinical assessments for hypertensive patients, especially those with concomitant diabetes, to detect and manage autonomic dysfunction at an early stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37506/66s3ka06
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomic Function Tests in Diabetic Hypertensive and Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients: A Case-Control Study

Mohd Yaseen, Kafeel Ahmad, Abdul Majid Siddiqui, Tanya Tripathi et al.
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Autonomic Function Tests in Diabetic Hypertensive and Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients: A Case-Control Study

Mohd Yaseen, Kafeel Ahmad, Abdul Majid Siddiqui, Tanya Tripathi, Eqbal Anwer
article en

Abstract

Background and Objective: Autonomic neuropathy, particularly cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, is a common complication in individuals with long-standing hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Both conditions are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Although autonomic dysfunction has been extensively studied in diabetes and in hypertension separately, the comparative assessment of autonomic dysfunction between diabetic hypertensive and non-diabetic hypertensive patients remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate and compare cardiovascular autonomic functions in diabetic hypertensive (DH) and non-diabetic hypertensive (NDH) individuals using standard clinical autonomic function tests, thus providing insights into the extent and patterns of autonomic impairment in each group.Methods: This study included 260 participants split into two groups: 130 DH patients (cases) and 130 NDH patients (controls), matched for age, sex, and duration of hypertension. Data on baseline clinical characteristics, including body mass index (BMI), duration of hypertension, glycemic control, and comorbidities, were recorded. Standard cardiovascular autonomic function tests were performed, including the heart rate response to deep breathing (HRDB), Valsalva maneuver (Valsalva ratio), orthostatic blood pressure changes, handgrip test, and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Statistical comparisons were made using univariate and multivariate analyses to account for covariates such as age, sex, and body mass index.Results: The DH group showed significantly lower HRDB and HRV indices than the NDH group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the drop in systolic blood pressure upon standing was more pronounced in the DH group, while the Valsalva ratio was decreased to a similar extent in both groups, suggesting a significant parasympathetic impairment in DH participants. Duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control (higher HbA1c), and longer duration of hypertension were significantly correlated with impaired autonomic function.Conclusion: Diabetic hypertensive patients exhibit more pronounced abnormalities in cardiovascular autonomic control when compared to non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Comprehensive autonomic function testing should be considered in routine clinical assessments for hypertensive patients, especially those with concomitant diabetes, to detect and manage autonomic dysfunction at an early stage.

Indian Journal of Public Health Research & DevelopmentVol. 16(4)
Career Institute Of Medical & Dental Sciences and Hospital (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.