Comparison of organ volumes and standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG‐PET/CT images using MOOSE and TotalSegmentator to segment CT images

The two software tools produce similar results in volume estimates for most anatomical structures. SUVmean is less dependent on the segmentation algorithm than SUVmax and SUVpeak and shows excellent reproducibility for all anatomical structures studied except for the bladder, the lungs and the skull.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Physics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of organ volumes and standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG‐PET/CT images using MOOSE and TotalSegmentator to segment CT images

Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar, Fanny Orlhac, Nina Jehanno, Romain‐David Seban et al.
1 citations
Medical Physics
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.36
article

Comparison of organ volumes and standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG‐PET/CT images using MOOSE and TotalSegmentator to segment CT images

Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar, Fanny Orlhac, Nina Jehanno, Romain‐David Seban, Christophe Nioche, Thomas Beyer, Irène Buvat, Narinée Hovhannisyan‐Baghdasarian, C. Loisel, Julie Auriac
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The two software tools produce similar results in volume estimates for most anatomical structures. SUVmean is less dependent on the segmentation algorithm than SUVmax and SUVpeak and shows excellent reproducibility for all anatomical structures studied except for the bladder, the lungs and the skull.

Medical PhysicsVol. 52(10)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Institut Curie (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.