A Comparative Study on Chinese Reading, Affective Domain, and Academic Achievement in Theme-Based vs Textbook-Based Liberal Chinese Classes

Despite China and Korea’s close historical and geographical ties, university-level Chinese courses have struggled due to rising anti-China sentiment and post-COVID negative perceptions. Unlike English, level-based learning in Chinese is difficult, often limiting students to basic vocabulary and sentence structures. This study examines the effectiveness of a theme-based curriculum focused on Chinese culture in enhancing students’ interest, confidence, motivation, and academic performance. Following the midterm examination, the experimental group received theme-based instruction, while the control group followed a textbook-based approach. The study compared both groups in terms of Chinese reading proficiency, pronunciation, affective factors, and academic achievement. The findings indicate that the theme-based group demonstrated significant improvements in pronunciation, reading, motivation, attitude, and confidence. Although no statistically significant difference in academic achievement was observed, the theme-based group achieved slightly higher final exam scores. These results suggest that a theme-based approach in foreign language education can enhance student engagement, foster motivation, and facilitate more effective language acquisition within a cultural context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25021/jcll.2025.8.153.247
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on Chinese Reading, Affective Domain, and Academic Achievement in Theme-Based vs Textbook-Based Liberal Chinese Classes

Eui-jeong Kim, Si-Yeon Pyo
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

A Comparative Study on Chinese Reading, Affective Domain, and Academic Achievement in Theme-Based vs Textbook-Based Liberal Chinese Classes

Eui-jeong Kim, Si-Yeon Pyo
article en

Abstract

Despite China and Korea’s close historical and geographical ties, university-level Chinese courses have struggled due to rising anti-China sentiment and post-COVID negative perceptions. Unlike English, level-based learning in Chinese is difficult, often limiting students to basic vocabulary and sentence structures. This study examines the effectiveness of a theme-based curriculum focused on Chinese culture in enhancing students’ interest, confidence, motivation, and academic performance. Following the midterm examination, the experimental group received theme-based instruction, while the control group followed a textbook-based approach. The study compared both groups in terms of Chinese reading proficiency, pronunciation, affective factors, and academic achievement. The findings indicate that the theme-based group demonstrated significant improvements in pronunciation, reading, motivation, attitude, and confidence. Although no statistically significant difference in academic achievement was observed, the theme-based group achieved slightly higher final exam scores. These results suggest that a theme-based approach in foreign language education can enhance student engagement, foster motivation, and facilitate more effective language acquisition within a cultural context.

The Journal of Chinese Language and LiteratureVol. 153
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.