Beyond User-centric: Modelling Privacy and Fairness Effects of Speech Interfaces on Community- and Society-Levels

Research on privacy protections for speech technology has focused on user-centric approaches. While this is a well-motivated starting point, broader AI research includes community- and society-level effects, known as human-centric AI (HCAI). This work addresses human-values-centric speech technology (HVST) through two use cases: 1) speech-operated devices controlled by one but used by several users, and 2) telecommunication services for speech without interoperability with other services. Our experiments model user preferences and choices regarding privacy and utility. The community-level analysis evaluates how users balance their preferences with those of their peers. The society-level analysis assesses the proportion of users oppressed and discriminated against by their peers. The main results indicate that oppression and discrimination due to speech technology can be reduced by allowing fine-grained tuning of privacy preferences and mandating interoperability between communication platforms.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21437/spsc.2025-3
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond User-centric: Modelling Privacy and Fairness Effects of Speech Interfaces on Community- and Society-Levels

Tom Bäckström, Fedor Vitiugin
Digital Communication and Language
article

Beyond User-centric: Modelling Privacy and Fairness Effects of Speech Interfaces on Community- and Society-Levels

Tom Bäckström, Fedor Vitiugin
article en

Abstract

Research on privacy protections for speech technology has focused on user-centric approaches. While this is a well-motivated starting point, broader AI research includes community- and society-level effects, known as human-centric AI (HCAI). This work addresses human-values-centric speech technology (HVST) through two use cases: 1) speech-operated devices controlled by one but used by several users, and 2) telecommunication services for speech without interoperability with other services. Our experiments model user preferences and choices regarding privacy and utility. The community-level analysis evaluates how users balance their preferences with those of their peers. The society-level analysis assesses the proportion of users oppressed and discriminated against by their peers. The main results indicate that oppression and discrimination due to speech technology can be reduced by allowing fine-grained tuning of privacy preferences and mandating interoperability between communication platforms.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.