Rethinking Global Responsibility: Moving Beyond U.S. Dominance in Humanitarian Aid to Collective International Engagement

This paper analyzes the changing contours of U.S. foreign policy dynamics, especially the strategic turn away from long‐standing humanitarian aid provided now through USAID during the Trump administration. The U.S., traditionally, has operated as the world’s nice guy—providing aid to stabilize the world order and promote soft power. Yet the paper challenges the savior-only model by proposing a new relationship that tilts the focus toward security cooperation, economic diplomacy, and multilateral partners. Utilizing qualitative policy analysis and descriptive case study research (in the form of the U.S. response to the Myanmar earthquake of 2025), the paper illustrates that a reduction in assistance does not necessarily undermine U.S. power. Instead, it opens the field to rising powers such as China to take their own, more global, development role, forcing a fundamental rethink of American strategy. In the end, the paper promotes a collaborative, accountable model where countries lead their own development and use their resources more efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2025.154046
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Global Responsibility: Moving Beyond U.S. Dominance in Humanitarian Aid to Collective International Engagement

Olatunji Joseph Egungbemi
Open Journal of Political Science
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Rethinking Global Responsibility: Moving Beyond U.S. Dominance in Humanitarian Aid to Collective International Engagement

Olatunji Joseph Egungbemi
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the changing contours of U.S. foreign policy dynamics, especially the strategic turn away from long‐standing humanitarian aid provided now through USAID during the Trump administration. The U.S., traditionally, has operated as the world’s nice guy—providing aid to stabilize the world order and promote soft power. Yet the paper challenges the savior-only model by proposing a new relationship that tilts the focus toward security cooperation, economic diplomacy, and multilateral partners. Utilizing qualitative policy analysis and descriptive case study research (in the form of the U.S. response to the Myanmar earthquake of 2025), the paper illustrates that a reduction in assistance does not necessarily undermine U.S. power. Instead, it opens the field to rising powers such as China to take their own, more global, development role, forcing a fundamental rethink of American strategy. In the end, the paper promotes a collaborative, accountable model where countries lead their own development and use their resources more efficiently.

Open Journal of Political ScienceVol. 15(04)
University of Wyoming (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.