Data Collection for Grant Reporting: Methods, Quality Assurance, and Technology Integration

This article examines data collection as the empirical foundation of grant reporting, emphasizing its role in producing credible, comprehensive, and persuasive reports. Both qualitative methods—such as interviews, focus groups, and case studies—and quantitative approaches—including surveys, program records, and financial data—are analyzed for their complementary contributions to assessing impact. The article stresses the importance of maintaining data quality through staff training, verification mechanisms, and ethical safeguards such as informed consent and confidentiality. It also highlights the growing role of technology, including mobile data collection tools, survey platforms, and open-source solutions, in improving efficiency and accessibility for organizations in low-resource environments. Case studies from education and healthcare demonstrate how combining qualitative insights with quantitative metrics results in holistic assessments that build funder confidence and strengthen organizational sustainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-grant-data-04
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Collection for Grant Reporting: Methods, Quality Assurance, and Technology Integration

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
3 citations
Research Data Management Practices
9.74
article

Data Collection for Grant Reporting: Methods, Quality Assurance, and Technology Integration

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines data collection as the empirical foundation of grant reporting, emphasizing its role in producing credible, comprehensive, and persuasive reports. Both qualitative methods—such as interviews, focus groups, and case studies—and quantitative approaches—including surveys, program records, and financial data—are analyzed for their complementary contributions to assessing impact. The article stresses the importance of maintaining data quality through staff training, verification mechanisms, and ethical safeguards such as informed consent and confidentiality. It also highlights the growing role of technology, including mobile data collection tools, survey platforms, and open-source solutions, in improving efficiency and accessibility for organizations in low-resource environments. Case studies from education and healthcare demonstrate how combining qualitative insights with quantitative metrics results in holistic assessments that build funder confidence and strengthen organizational sustainability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Research Data Management Practices
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.