Revisiting the Privacy of Low-Frequency Speech Signals: Exploring Resampling Methods, Evaluation Scenarios, and Speaker Characteristics

While audio recordings in real life provide insights into social dynamics and conversational behavior, they also raise concerns about the privacy of personal, sensitive data. This article explores the effectiveness of restricting recordings to low-frequency audio to protect spoken content. For resampling the audio signals to different sampling rates, we compare the effect of employing anti-aliasing filtering. Privacy enhancement is measured by an increased word error rate of automatic speech recognition models. The impact on utility performance is measured with voice activity detection models. Our experimental results show that for clean recordings, models trained with a sampling rate of up to 800 Hz transcribe the majority of words correctly. For both models, we analyzed the impact of the speaker's sex and pitch, and we demonstrated that missing anti-aliasing filters more strongly compromise speech privacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21437/spsc.2025-13
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Privacy of Low-Frequency Speech Signals: Exploring Resampling Methods, Evaluation Scenarios, and Speaker Characteristics

Jule Pohlhausen, Jöerg Bitzer
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Revisiting the Privacy of Low-Frequency Speech Signals: Exploring Resampling Methods, Evaluation Scenarios, and Speaker Characteristics

Jule Pohlhausen, Jöerg Bitzer
article en

Abstract

While audio recordings in real life provide insights into social dynamics and conversational behavior, they also raise concerns about the privacy of personal, sensitive data. This article explores the effectiveness of restricting recordings to low-frequency audio to protect spoken content. For resampling the audio signals to different sampling rates, we compare the effect of employing anti-aliasing filtering. Privacy enhancement is measured by an increased word error rate of automatic speech recognition models. The impact on utility performance is measured with voice activity detection models. Our experimental results show that for clean recordings, models trained with a sampling rate of up to 800 Hz transcribe the majority of words correctly. For both models, we analyzed the impact of the speaker's sex and pitch, and we demonstrated that missing anti-aliasing filters more strongly compromise speech privacy.

Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.