Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods

As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese ( n = 672) and Danish ( n = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments. • The Chinese and Danish participants expressed the highest acceptance for legumes. • Chinese participants demonstrated more pro-environmental perceptions. • Danish participants displayed negativity to plant-based meat analogues and hybrids. • Cultural perceptions and acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods were present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105714
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods

Iver Jakobsen, Marleen C. Onwezen, Derek V. Byrne, Fang Zhong et al.
Food Quality and Preference
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods

Iver Jakobsen, Marleen C. Onwezen, Derek V. Byrne, Fang Zhong, Barbara Vad Andersen, Yawei Wang
article en

Abstract

As the world population continues to grow, adopting more sustainable eating behaviors becomes crucial to mitigating climate degradation. The study aimed to investigate Chinese ( n = 672) and Danish ( n = 272) consumers acceptance of sustainable protein-rich alternatives. This was done by presenting three categories of sustainable alternatives: legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods in two identical online surveys. It was found that the Chinese participants held greater familiarity with the included food categories, more positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors and higher consumption frequency of legumes and plant-based meat analogues and hybrids compared to the Danish. Both participants demonstrated the highest acceptance for legumes, followed by plant-based meat analogues and lastly, cell-based foods. Comparatively, cell-based foods seemed more promising for the Chinese participants while the Danish participants viewed plant-based meat analogues and hybrids more negatively on several aspects. Consumption scenarios were also evaluated for appropriateness across food categories, meal types, physical and social contexts, revealing distinct participant preferences. Legumes emerged as the more appropriate food choice for the participants. Generally, the Chinese participants showed more openness to sustainable protein-rich foods whereas the Danish remained more reluctant. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in consumer perceptions of sustainable protein-rich foods and highlight the necessity for research focusing on a variety of drivers and barriers to consumption. It systematically investigated; legumes, plant-based meat analogues and hybrids, and cell-based foods, allowing for an in-depth comparison to be included in future research and policy developments. • The Chinese and Danish participants expressed the highest acceptance for legumes. • Chinese participants demonstrated more pro-environmental perceptions. • Danish participants displayed negativity to plant-based meat analogues and hybrids. • Cultural perceptions and acceptance of sustainable protein-rich foods were present.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 135
Aarhus University (DK), Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Jiangnan University, Sino-Danish Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.