Equivalent squares of circular electron fields

The results show that there is an exceptionally simple and remarkably accurate relationship for the equivalent square of circular electron fields, namely: X = 1.83 R, where R is the radius and X is the side length of the equivalent square. This is approximately midway between the two limiting values predicted by Fermi-Eyges theory ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:msqrt> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\sqrt \pi \le X/R \le 2$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ). For the 104 combinations of the parameters described above, the average ratio of the circular field output to the equivalent square output is 1.000, and the standard deviation is 0.003. In every case, the accuracy is better than 1% and, in most cases, better than 0.5%. Almost all the ratios fall within the ±0.4% accuracy expected based on the statistical uncertainty in the Monte Carlo calculations. It is shown that the equivalent square rule for circles is more accurate than the square root rule for a range of common widths, W, and L/W, where L is the length of the rectangle. For the clinical examples cited, the agreement between estimated and measured output is within a few percent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70264
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivalent squares of circular electron fields

Patrick N. McDermott
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Equivalent squares of circular electron fields

Patrick N. McDermott
article en

Abstract

The results show that there is an exceptionally simple and remarkably accurate relationship for the equivalent square of circular electron fields, namely: X = 1.83 R, where R is the radius and X is the side length of the equivalent square. This is approximately midway between the two limiting values predicted by Fermi-Eyges theory ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:msqrt> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\sqrt \pi \le X/R \le 2$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ). For the 104 combinations of the parameters described above, the average ratio of the circular field output to the equivalent square output is 1.000, and the standard deviation is 0.003. In every case, the accuracy is better than 1% and, in most cases, better than 0.5%. Almost all the ratios fall within the ±0.4% accuracy expected based on the statistical uncertainty in the Monte Carlo calculations. It is shown that the equivalent square rule for circles is more accurate than the square root rule for a range of common widths, W, and L/W, where L is the length of the rectangle. For the clinical examples cited, the agreement between estimated and measured output is within a few percent.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 26(10)
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Beaumont Hospital, Troy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.