Socio-cultural and economic determinants of clean cooking technology adoption in Uganda
This study examined socio-cultural and economic determinants influencing clean cooking technology adoption, with emphasis on cultural norms, gender roles, income, education, and user perceptions in Uganda. A cross-sectional survey of 480 households from urban, peri-urban, and rural areas in six districts employed structured interviews and questionnaires. Awareness of improved cook stoves and alternative fuels (briquettes, LPG, ethanol) was high (74%), but adoption was low (27%). Major barriers included high upfront costs (68%), limited distribution networks (52%), and perceived incompatibility with traditional cooking methods, especially for staple dishes. Adoption was significantly (p < 0.05) higher among households with at least one adult completing secondary education (42% vs. 18%) and those earning above UGX 300,000 or 83.90 USD /month, who were 3.1 times more likely to adopt. Women were the primary cooks in 93% of households, with girls aged 7–16 frequently assisting. Cultural beliefs, such as firewood enhancing food flavor and symbolizing tradition, further influenced adoption decisions. The findings indicated that accelerating clean cooking adoption in Uganda requires culturally sensitive and gender-responsive interventions, integration of local knowledge, targeted behavior change communication, supportive policy frameworks, and sustained financing. Strengthening supply chains and empowering women as energy entrepreneurs are essential to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) on universal modern energy access.
Authors
- Evans Atwijukire
- Ephraim Nuwamanya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-0628)
- Michael Ahimbisibwe
- Haam Rukundo
- Moses Angeny
- Isaac Newton
- Birungi Oswaldo
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2025.100305
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.16