Comparative Evaluation of Liposomes and Niosomes in Gene Delivery

The current study used HEK293 and HeLa cell lines to compare liposomes and niosomes as nanocarriers for gene transfer. After preparing and characterizing liposomal and niosomal formulations containing GFP-encoding plasmid DNA, the effectiveness and cytotoxicity of transfection were evaluated in vitro. According to ANOVA and post hoc analysis, liposomes demonstrated a considerably greater transfection efficiency than niosomes in both cell lines (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, cytotoxicity tests showed that niosomes retained somewhat improved biocompatibility, but variations in cell viability remained statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). These results show that niosomes provide a safer substitute with decreased cytotoxicity, indicating a trade-off between efficiency and safety, even though liposomes perform better at delivering genes. Therefore, the study offers a comparison framework for choosing appropriate nanocarriers for upcoming gene therapy applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Integrated Medical Sciences
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64063/3049-1681.vol.2.issue9.7
Primary Topic
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Liposomes and Niosomes in Gene Delivery

Replantful Chiangkata
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Integrated Medical Sciences
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
article

Comparative Evaluation of Liposomes and Niosomes in Gene Delivery

Replantful Chiangkata
article en

Abstract

The current study used HEK293 and HeLa cell lines to compare liposomes and niosomes as nanocarriers for gene transfer. After preparing and characterizing liposomal and niosomal formulations containing GFP-encoding plasmid DNA, the effectiveness and cytotoxicity of transfection were evaluated in vitro. According to ANOVA and post hoc analysis, liposomes demonstrated a considerably greater transfection efficiency than niosomes in both cell lines (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, cytotoxicity tests showed that niosomes retained somewhat improved biocompatibility, but variations in cell viability remained statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). These results show that niosomes provide a safer substitute with decreased cytotoxicity, indicating a trade-off between efficiency and safety, even though liposomes perform better at delivering genes. Therefore, the study offers a comparison framework for choosing appropriate nanocarriers for upcoming gene therapy applications.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Integrated Medical Sciences
University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of Liposomes and Niosomes in Gene Delivery — Replantful Chiangkata · Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Integrated Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS