Drone Attacks in Pakistan during the Obama Era: Impact on the US–Pakistan Relations

Aim of the Study: The research investigates consequences of the drone attacks by the United States in Pakistan during Obama government (2009-2017). Apparently, the drone strikes were aimed at removing militant threats; however, the strikes instigated national level resentment across Pakistan owing to perceived notions of violations of state sovereignty, extensive civilian deaths and causalties. The research is an attempt to comprehend how such remote-controlled operations impacted the US-Pak relations and catalyzed anti-American feelings leading to recessed bilateral cooperation. Methodology: The research uses framework of Constructivism to examine how concepts of identity, norms and perceptions have impacted public discourse and official policy responses in Pakistan. The research is completed using primary data- declassified documents and newspaper reports have been used for analysis which was acquired by accessing different digital archives and newspapers. Findings: The results reflect a complex paradox: The drone attacks inside Pakistan, owing to their precision, are backed by some sections of local populations in stark opposition to national outcry and diplomatic resentment. Findings of the research highlight rigidity between security essentials and global legal norms, raising critical questions regarding responsibility, legitimacy and long-term apprehensions of remote conflict on international relations and domestic politics inside Pakistan. Conclusion: The study concluded that the drone strikes, during Obama era, significantly impacted the US-Pak relations;. Importantly, the issue brought to fore critical questions of sovereignty, legality and collateral damage in the form of civilian deaths and causalties. There were sections of population that backed the attacks for their precision and effective bulwark against the militants;. There were others who considered these strikes as a continuous violation of national dignity and a source of anti-American feelings amongst the Pakistani populace. The attacks were shrouded in secrecy and absence of the host-state recognition intensified the public outrage and diplomatic tensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
THE PROGRESS A Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71016/tp/rvk34m46
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drone Attacks in Pakistan during the Obama Era: Impact on the US–Pakistan Relations

Siroor Anil Kumar Mirza Nemath Ali Baig, Dalir Khan
THE PROGRESS A Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Drone Attacks in Pakistan during the Obama Era: Impact on the US–Pakistan Relations

Siroor Anil Kumar Mirza Nemath Ali Baig, Dalir Khan
article en

Abstract

Aim of the Study: The research investigates consequences of the drone attacks by the United States in Pakistan during Obama government (2009-2017). Apparently, the drone strikes were aimed at removing militant threats; however, the strikes instigated national level resentment across Pakistan owing to perceived notions of violations of state sovereignty, extensive civilian deaths and causalties. The research is an attempt to comprehend how such remote-controlled operations impacted the US-Pak relations and catalyzed anti-American feelings leading to recessed bilateral cooperation. Methodology: The research uses framework of Constructivism to examine how concepts of identity, norms and perceptions have impacted public discourse and official policy responses in Pakistan. The research is completed using primary data- declassified documents and newspaper reports have been used for analysis which was acquired by accessing different digital archives and newspapers. Findings: The results reflect a complex paradox: The drone attacks inside Pakistan, owing to their precision, are backed by some sections of local populations in stark opposition to national outcry and diplomatic resentment. Findings of the research highlight rigidity between security essentials and global legal norms, raising critical questions regarding responsibility, legitimacy and long-term apprehensions of remote conflict on international relations and domestic politics inside Pakistan. Conclusion: The study concluded that the drone strikes, during Obama era, significantly impacted the US-Pak relations;. Importantly, the issue brought to fore critical questions of sovereignty, legality and collateral damage in the form of civilian deaths and causalties. There were sections of population that backed the attacks for their precision and effective bulwark against the militants;. There were others who considered these strikes as a continuous violation of national dignity and a source of anti-American feelings amongst the Pakistani populace. The attacks were shrouded in secrecy and absence of the host-state recognition intensified the public outrage and diplomatic tensions.

THE PROGRESS A Journal of Multidisciplinary StudiesVol. 6(3)
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK), Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.