Corporate social advocacy: a comparative study among four countries

Purpose This study investigated how people view corporate social advocacy (CSA) from a cross-country perspective and focused on public’s perceptions of the roles and their expectations of corporations when engaging in CSA and explores how culture influences these views. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized surveys from Australia, Belgium, China and the United States. Findings Results indicated that the four countries differed in their views on the roles of corporations in engaging in CSA. However, participants from four countries saw similar patterns when it comes to motivations for corporations to engage in CSA. In addition, culture plays an inconsistent role in describing how people from different countries perceive corporations’ engagement in CSA. Originality/value This study is an early attempt to explore CSA on a cross-national scale and to investigate the role of culture in shaping people’s perceptions about CSA. This study yields important theoretical and practical insights about CSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Communications An International Journal
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-06-2025-0154
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate social advocacy: a comparative study among four countries

Anli Xiao, Luke W. Capizzo, Fritz Cropp, Yu Chen
Corporate Communications An International Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate social advocacy: a comparative study among four countries

Anli Xiao, Luke W. Capizzo, Fritz Cropp, Yu Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated how people view corporate social advocacy (CSA) from a cross-country perspective and focused on public’s perceptions of the roles and their expectations of corporations when engaging in CSA and explores how culture influences these views. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized surveys from Australia, Belgium, China and the United States. Findings Results indicated that the four countries differed in their views on the roles of corporations in engaging in CSA. However, participants from four countries saw similar patterns when it comes to motivations for corporations to engage in CSA. In addition, culture plays an inconsistent role in describing how people from different countries perceive corporations’ engagement in CSA. Originality/value This study is an early attempt to explore CSA on a cross-national scale and to investigate the role of culture in shaping people’s perceptions about CSA. This study yields important theoretical and practical insights about CSA.

Corporate Communications An International Journal
Florida State University (US), African University College of Communications (GH), University of Missouri (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate social advocacy: a comparative study among four countries — Anli Xiao, Luke W. Capizzo, et al. · Corporate Communications An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS