Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children’s use of technology: A systematic review (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Technology is integrated into children’s daily lives, with parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives shaping children’s technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives is essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This systematic review aimed to investigate questionnaires that have been used to assess parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives on young children’s use of technology related to health, wellbeing, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or healthcare professionals’ perspectives on technology use among children aged birth-5 years. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and quality assessment. Deductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesise the reported perspectives. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Eighty-five studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals’ perspectives. The methodological quality of questionnaires used was generally low and only 39 studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used. Of these, 15 studies reported more than one measure of validity or reliability. Seventy-five studies reported participants’ perspectives on children’s technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children’s physical health, emotions, and behaviours. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Parents’ perspectives on children’s technology use are frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the quality of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognised but countered with concerns about the impact on children’s physical health and development. High-quality tools are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology decision-making with children. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.84712
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children’s use of technology: A systematic review (Preprint)

Amber Beynon, Courtenay Harris, Kate Mannell, Susan Edwards et al.
1 citations
Child Development and Digital Technology
8.93
article

Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children’s use of technology: A systematic review (Preprint)

Amber Beynon, Courtenay Harris, Kate Mannell, Susan Edwards, Ivan P.H. Au, Sarah Stearne, Juliana Zabatiero, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Leon Straker, George Thomas, Danica Hendry, Lisa K. Kervin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Technology is integrated into children’s daily lives, with parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives shaping children’s technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives is essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This systematic review aimed to investigate questionnaires that have been used to assess parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives on young children’s use of technology related to health, wellbeing, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or healthcare professionals’ perspectives on technology use among children aged birth-5 years. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and quality assessment. Deductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesise the reported perspectives. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Eighty-five studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals’ perspectives. The methodological quality of questionnaires used was generally low and only 39 studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used. Of these, 15 studies reported more than one measure of validity or reliability. Seventy-five studies reported participants’ perspectives on children’s technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children’s physical health, emotions, and behaviours. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Parents’ perspectives on children’s technology use are frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the quality of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognised but countered with concerns about the impact on children’s physical health and development. High-quality tools are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology decision-making with children. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child Development and Digital Technology
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.