Comparative Effectiveness of Small Bowel Decompression Methods in Patients with Benign Small Bowel Obstruction: Results of a Multicenter Non-Randomized Controlled Retrospective Study

Introduction. The success of treatment of patients with acute intestinal obstruction is determined by many factors, including the correction of intra-abdominal hypertension and endotoxicosis by performing intraoperative decompression of the small intestine. Aim of Study. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of small intestinal decompression methods in patients with benign forms of small bowel obstruction. Material and Methods. The present work was conducted as a multicenter cohort retrospective study, including the analysis of treatment outcomes of 397 patients operated on for benign forms of intestinal obstruction, who underwent one of three types of intestinal decompression intraoperatively: placement of a gastric tube, intubation of the initial sections of the small intestine, and total intubation of the intestine. The study groups did not demonstrate significant differences in the main clinical, laboratory parameters, causes of intestinal obstruction, and intraoperative findings. Significant differences were revealed when comparing the degree of intestinal dilation and the resection nature of the intervention, that influenced both the choice of decompression method and, probably, the outcome of treatment - these parameters were taken into account as confounders. Conclusion. Carrying out total nasogastrointestinal intubation for decompressive purposes in patients with benign forms of intestinal obstruction was associated with the highest mortality (22.3% versus 7.0% in the group with nasogastric tubes, and 13.3% in the group with short intestinal tubes, p<0.001) even in the context of the comparative predominance of resection interventions in this group of patients. As for the other methods of intraoperative intestinal decompression, the data obtained do not allow us to make an unambiguous choice between the installation of a nasogastric tube or intubation of the initial parts of the small intestine, since when taking into account the main confounders, no significant differences in the studied outcomes were found in these groups of patients. Keywords: acute intestinal obstruction, nasogastric tube, nasointestinal tube, intestinal decompression> < 0.001) even in the context of the comparative predominance of resection interventions in this group of patients. As for the other methods of intraoperative intestinal decompression, the data obtained do not allow us to make an unambiguous choice between the installation of a nasogastric tube or intubation of the initial parts of the small intestine, since when taking into account the main confounders, no significant differences in the studied outcomes were found in these groups of patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2025-14-3-487-498
Primary Topic
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Small Bowel Decompression Methods in Patients with Benign Small Bowel Obstruction: Results of a Multicenter Non-Randomized Controlled Retrospective Study

И В Михин, Anatoliy Zavrazhnov, Vladimir A. Samartsev, М. П. Кузнецова et al.
Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Small Bowel Decompression Methods in Patients with Benign Small Bowel Obstruction: Results of a Multicenter Non-Randomized Controlled Retrospective Study

И В Михин, Anatoliy Zavrazhnov, Vladimir A. Samartsev, М. П. Кузнецова, A. A. Kurkov, А. В. Глебова, П. А. Котков, Б. В. Сигуа, А. Е. Демко, E. V. Nishnevich, С. В. Петров, I. A. Solov’ev, V. P. Zemlyanoy, I. Ia. Bondarevskiy
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The success of treatment of patients with acute intestinal obstruction is determined by many factors, including the correction of intra-abdominal hypertension and endotoxicosis by performing intraoperative decompression of the small intestine. Aim of Study. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of small intestinal decompression methods in patients with benign forms of small bowel obstruction. Material and Methods. The present work was conducted as a multicenter cohort retrospective study, including the analysis of treatment outcomes of 397 patients operated on for benign forms of intestinal obstruction, who underwent one of three types of intestinal decompression intraoperatively: placement of a gastric tube, intubation of the initial sections of the small intestine, and total intubation of the intestine. The study groups did not demonstrate significant differences in the main clinical, laboratory parameters, causes of intestinal obstruction, and intraoperative findings. Significant differences were revealed when comparing the degree of intestinal dilation and the resection nature of the intervention, that influenced both the choice of decompression method and, probably, the outcome of treatment - these parameters were taken into account as confounders. Conclusion. Carrying out total nasogastrointestinal intubation for decompressive purposes in patients with benign forms of intestinal obstruction was associated with the highest mortality (22.3% versus 7.0% in the group with nasogastric tubes, and 13.3% in the group with short intestinal tubes, p<0.001) even in the context of the comparative predominance of resection interventions in this group of patients. As for the other methods of intraoperative intestinal decompression, the data obtained do not allow us to make an unambiguous choice between the installation of a nasogastric tube or intubation of the initial parts of the small intestine, since when taking into account the main confounders, no significant differences in the studied outcomes were found in these groups of patients. Keywords: acute intestinal obstruction, nasogastric tube, nasointestinal tube, intestinal decompression> < 0.001) even in the context of the comparative predominance of resection interventions in this group of patients. As for the other methods of intraoperative intestinal decompression, the data obtained do not allow us to make an unambiguous choice between the installation of a nasogastric tube or intubation of the initial parts of the small intestine, since when taking into account the main confounders, no significant differences in the studied outcomes were found in these groups of patients.

Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical CareVol. 14(3)
Volgograd State Medical University (RU), Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU), Perm State Medical Academy (RU), Regional Clinical Hospital No 4 (RU), Ural State Medical University (RU), St. Petersburg State Health Care Foundation "Mariinsky City Hospital" (RU), Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine (RU), North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.