The four ways of knowing: revising the 4P model of knowing through a non-dual and reflexive perspective

Abstract Vervaeke and Mastropietro’s 4P model of knowing is a non-representational and process-oriented framework that integrates four interrelated ways of knowing: propositional, procedural, perspectival, and participatory. In this paper, we revise this model, drawing on the enactive approach and insights from Madhyamaka and Yogācāra Buddhist traditions of philosophy. We first provide an integrated overview of the 4P model and identify three questions concerning the conceptualization of participatory knowing and the ontological status of distinctions between the four ways of knowing. We then introduce the enactive and Buddhist resources that inform our treatment, and address these questions through a non-dual and reflexive treatment that preserves the framework’s pedagogical and transformative potential. Finally, we discuss how the revised framework can inform fields as diverse as education, psychotherapy, and contemplative pedagogy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-026-10223-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The four ways of knowing: revising the 4P model of knowing through a non-dual and reflexive perspective

Daniel Meling, John Vervaeke, Hüseyin Beyköylü
1 citations
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
33.40
article

The four ways of knowing: revising the 4P model of knowing through a non-dual and reflexive perspective

Daniel Meling, John Vervaeke, Hüseyin Beyköylü
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Vervaeke and Mastropietro’s 4P model of knowing is a non-representational and process-oriented framework that integrates four interrelated ways of knowing: propositional, procedural, perspectival, and participatory. In this paper, we revise this model, drawing on the enactive approach and insights from Madhyamaka and Yogācāra Buddhist traditions of philosophy. We first provide an integrated overview of the 4P model and identify three questions concerning the conceptualization of participatory knowing and the ontological status of distinctions between the four ways of knowing. We then introduce the enactive and Buddhist resources that inform our treatment, and address these questions through a non-dual and reflexive treatment that preserves the framework’s pedagogical and transformative potential. Finally, we discuss how the revised framework can inform fields as diverse as education, psychotherapy, and contemplative pedagogy.

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Harvard University, University of Oxford, Stanford Bio-X
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
33.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The four ways of knowing: revising the 4P model of knowing through a non-dual and reflexive perspective — Daniel Meling, John Vervaeke, et al. · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS