Effectiveness of Safety Control in Surgical Care for Patients with Abdominal Sepsis

Relevance. Improving surgical outcomes in patients with abdominal sepsis, including enhancing the quality and safety of care by preventing diagnostic and treatment-related errors, remains a top priority in emergency medicine. Aim of the Study. To perform a comparative clinical analysis of the effectiveness of surgical safety control based on the implementation of an improved checklist titled “Preventive Measures Checklist for Defects in Surgical Care for Abdominal Sepsis”. Material and Methods. This retrospective and prospective controlled clinical study included 49 patients with abdominal sepsis resulting from secondary postoperative diffuse purulent peritonitis. The patients received comprehensive treatment programs that involved different approaches to controlling and preventing surgical care defects. In the comparison group A (31 patients), the improved checklist was used retrospectively by analyzing primary medical records to identify previously occurred defects in surgical care. In the main group B (18 patients), the same checklist was applied prospectively during the actual surgical care process. Results. The controlled comparative clinical study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the number of surgical care defects, the severity of endogenous intoxication, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the duration of hospital stay in patients with abdominal sepsis when the improved checklist was integrated into the treatment protocol. Conclusion. Prospective application of the improved surgical safety checklist significantly reduced the frequency of documentation errors from 38.7–67.7% to 11.1–0% (p<0.05); diagnostic errors from 80.6% to 0% (p><0.05); preoperative and intraoperative management errors from 19.4–74.2% to 16.7–0% (p><0.05); and postoperative care errors from 6.5–83.9% to 11.1–0% (p><0.05). > < 0.05); diagnostic errors from 80.6% to 0% (p < 0.05); preoperative and intraoperative management errors from 19.4–74.2% to 16.7–0% (p < 0.05); and postoperative care errors from 6.5–83.9% to 11.1–0% (p < 0.05). The effectiveness of the improved surgical safety checklist is further evidenced by a significant decrease in serum markers of endogenous intoxication (p < 0.05), increased bioelectrical activity of the small intestine (p < 0.05), and reduced postoperative complications — including intra-abdominal abscesses (from 45.2% to 11.1%, p=0.05), eventrations (from 35.5% to 0%, p=0.03), and pulmonary complications (from 61.3% to 11.1%, p=0.05). The length of hospital stay among survivors also decreased significantly from 39.3±2.1 to 22.5±1.1 days (p=0.002).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2025-14-3-547-557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Safety Control in Surgical Care for Patients with Abdominal Sepsis

А. А. Anisimov, A. Yu. Anisimov, Yu. A. Anisimov
1 citations
Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
2.52
article

Effectiveness of Safety Control in Surgical Care for Patients with Abdominal Sepsis

А. А. Anisimov, A. Yu. Anisimov, Yu. A. Anisimov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Relevance. Improving surgical outcomes in patients with abdominal sepsis, including enhancing the quality and safety of care by preventing diagnostic and treatment-related errors, remains a top priority in emergency medicine. Aim of the Study. To perform a comparative clinical analysis of the effectiveness of surgical safety control based on the implementation of an improved checklist titled “Preventive Measures Checklist for Defects in Surgical Care for Abdominal Sepsis”. Material and Methods. This retrospective and prospective controlled clinical study included 49 patients with abdominal sepsis resulting from secondary postoperative diffuse purulent peritonitis. The patients received comprehensive treatment programs that involved different approaches to controlling and preventing surgical care defects. In the comparison group A (31 patients), the improved checklist was used retrospectively by analyzing primary medical records to identify previously occurred defects in surgical care. In the main group B (18 patients), the same checklist was applied prospectively during the actual surgical care process. Results. The controlled comparative clinical study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the number of surgical care defects, the severity of endogenous intoxication, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the duration of hospital stay in patients with abdominal sepsis when the improved checklist was integrated into the treatment protocol. Conclusion. Prospective application of the improved surgical safety checklist significantly reduced the frequency of documentation errors from 38.7–67.7% to 11.1–0% (p<0.05); diagnostic errors from 80.6% to 0% (p><0.05); preoperative and intraoperative management errors from 19.4–74.2% to 16.7–0% (p><0.05); and postoperative care errors from 6.5–83.9% to 11.1–0% (p><0.05). > < 0.05); diagnostic errors from 80.6% to 0% (p < 0.05); preoperative and intraoperative management errors from 19.4–74.2% to 16.7–0% (p < 0.05); and postoperative care errors from 6.5–83.9% to 11.1–0% (p < 0.05). The effectiveness of the improved surgical safety checklist is further evidenced by a significant decrease in serum markers of endogenous intoxication (p < 0.05), increased bioelectrical activity of the small intestine (p < 0.05), and reduced postoperative complications — including intra-abdominal abscesses (from 45.2% to 11.1%, p=0.05), eventrations (from 35.5% to 0%, p=0.03), and pulmonary complications (from 61.3% to 11.1%, p=0.05). The length of hospital stay among survivors also decreased significantly from 39.3±2.1 to 22.5±1.1 days (p=0.002).

Russian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical CareVol. 14(3)
Kazan State Medical University (RU), Kazan Federal University (RU), Research Institute of Emergency Care (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.