Efficacy and Safety of Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate Compared to Escitalopram in Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind Study

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate versus Escitalopram in treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Methods: Sixty participants, aged 18-65, diagnosed with MDD, were randomized to receive either FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate or Escitalopram for 28 days. Depression severity was measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and vital signs. FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate significantly reduced HAM-D17 and MADRS scores more than Escitalopram (mean changes: -8.67 vs. -3.80 and -12.33 vs. -9.66, respectively). Adverse events were fewer in the FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate group, with only one reported case compared to seven in the Escitalopram group. Conclusion: FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate demonstrated superior efficacy and a better safety profile compared to Escitalopram, suggesting it as a promising alternative treatment for MDD. Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits and optimal dosing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37506/jfc9aw22
Primary Topic
Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate Compared to Escitalopram in Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind Study

Yashaswini Akoju, Chyanya Deepak P, G. Prasad Rao, Amarpreet Devi et al.
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
article

Efficacy and Safety of Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate Compared to Escitalopram in Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind Study

Yashaswini Akoju, Chyanya Deepak P, G. Prasad Rao, Amarpreet Devi, Simhachalam Gurugubelli, Mounika Gongareddy
article en

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate versus Escitalopram in treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Methods: Sixty participants, aged 18-65, diagnosed with MDD, were randomized to receive either FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate or Escitalopram for 28 days. Depression severity was measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and vital signs. FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate significantly reduced HAM-D17 and MADRS scores more than Escitalopram (mean changes: -8.67 vs. -3.80 and -12.33 vs. -9.66, respectively). Adverse events were fewer in the FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate group, with only one reported case compared to seven in the Escitalopram group. Conclusion: FDC containing Acetyl-L-carnitine and Agmatine Sulfate demonstrated superior efficacy and a better safety profile compared to Escitalopram, suggesting it as a promising alternative treatment for MDD. Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits and optimal dosing.

Indian Journal of Public Health Research & DevelopmentVol. 16(4)
Asha Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.