Experimental Verification of Bell‐Type Inequalities Using Four‐Qubit Dicke States on Quantum Processors

Abstract Testing for a violation of Bell‐type inequalities provides a standard approach to investigating nonlocal correlations in nonclassical (entangled) states. In this study, a custom measurement operator composed of a linear combination of Pauli matrices (, , and ) is constructed to examine such violations. Both theoretical and experimental analyses of Bell‐type inequality violations using two‐ and four‐qubit Dicke states implemented on quantum computers are presented. Specifically, two methods for preparing four‐qubit Dicke states—gate‐based and statevector‐based—are compared, and their performance is assessed on two IBM superconducting quantum processors, ibm_kyiv and ibm_sherbrooke . In the two‐qubit scenario, a clear violation of the CHSH inequality is observed, with a maximum Bell parameter of achieved using M3 error mitigation, closely approaching the theoretical upper bound of . For the four‐qubit case, a Dicke‐state‐specific Bell‐type inequality is applied and a maximal violation of is reported without additional mitigation using the statevector‐based approach. These findings show that while error mitigation improves outcomes in gate‐based methods, the statevector‐based approach naturally provides higher fidelity with reduced noise. This work underscores the importance of state preparation strategies and noise management in exploring quantum correlations on current quantum computing platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202500366
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Verification of Bell‐Type Inequalities Using Four‐Qubit Dicke States on Quantum Processors

V. Narayanan, Shreya Banerjee, Prasanta K. Panigrahi, Harsh Mehta et al.
1 citations
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
1.25
article

Experimental Verification of Bell‐Type Inequalities Using Four‐Qubit Dicke States on Quantum Processors

V. Narayanan, Shreya Banerjee, Prasanta K. Panigrahi, Harsh Mehta, Tomis Prajapati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Testing for a violation of Bell‐type inequalities provides a standard approach to investigating nonlocal correlations in nonclassical (entangled) states. In this study, a custom measurement operator composed of a linear combination of Pauli matrices (, , and ) is constructed to examine such violations. Both theoretical and experimental analyses of Bell‐type inequality violations using two‐ and four‐qubit Dicke states implemented on quantum computers are presented. Specifically, two methods for preparing four‐qubit Dicke states—gate‐based and statevector‐based—are compared, and their performance is assessed on two IBM superconducting quantum processors, ibm_kyiv and ibm_sherbrooke . In the two‐qubit scenario, a clear violation of the CHSH inequality is observed, with a maximum Bell parameter of achieved using M3 error mitigation, closely approaching the theoretical upper bound of . For the four‐qubit case, a Dicke‐state‐specific Bell‐type inequality is applied and a maximal violation of is reported without additional mitigation using the statevector‐based approach. These findings show that while error mitigation improves outcomes in gate‐based methods, the statevector‐based approach naturally provides higher fidelity with reduced noise. This work underscores the importance of state preparation strategies and noise management in exploring quantum correlations on current quantum computing platforms.

Advanced Quantum TechnologiesVol. 8(11)
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.