Prognostic value of tumor bulk in modern management of common lymphoma subtypes: an Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry study
The presence of a single large site of disease or so-called tumor 'bulk' in lymphoma has been variably associated with outcomes and influenced management decisions. However, challenges arise in using bulk as a prognosticator due to varied definitions across different lymphoma subtypes but also within studies of each subtype, increased utility of positron emission tomography in decision-making and recent incorporation of novel therapies. We analyzed data from the Australasian Lymphoma Registry regarding presence and influence of bulk on outcomes and treatment decisions in six key subtypes: diffuse large B-cell, follicular, marginal zone, T-cell, Hodgkin and Burkitt lymphoma. Of the 5,090 eligible patients identified between 2016-2025, 88% had documented information on the presence of bulk (registry definition >5 cm). Patients with bulk were more likely to receive systemic chemotherapy alone, and less likely to have localized treatment alone (radiotherapy and/or surgery), compared to those without bulk. Bulk was associated with inferior overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and superior overall survival in those with Hodgkin lymphoma, in the univariate analyses. Exploratory analyses using disease-specific bulk definitions from clinicians practicing in Australia and New Zealand showed inferior progression-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (bulk >7.5 cm) and inferior overall survival in those with Burkitt lymphoma (bulk >10 cm), but not other subtypes. We demonstrated real-world evidence of management heterogeneity for patients with bulk, with potential prognostic implications. International standardization of the definition of bulk is urged for uniform utility in positron emission tomography-based and molecular prognostication across clinical studies. Trial registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ANZCTRN12617000050358.
Authors
- Eliza A. Hawkes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-2559)
- Pietro R Di Ciaccio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-8619)
- Eliza Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-1033)
- Constantine Si Lun Tam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-5017)
- Erica M. Wood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7527-2340)
- Belinda A. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-8723)
- Gareth Peter Gregory (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-0682)
- Allison Barraclough (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-0540)
- Geoffrey Chong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4006-2380)
- Greg Hapgood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-8496)
- Cameron Wellard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-5394)
- Stephen Opat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-6458)
- Zoe McQuilten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-7185)
- Anna Johnston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-5203)
- Luke Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6818-0664)
Institutions
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU)
- Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
- Canberra Hospital (AU)
- Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU)
- Eastern Health (AU)
- Ballarat Health Services (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
- ACT Government (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Haematologica
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287919
- Primary Topic
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Gilead Sciences
- Celgene
- CSL Behring
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- TG Therapeutics
- Australian Government
- BeiGene
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
- Pharmacyclics