Understanding management educators’ perspectives on AI adoption: A qualitative study

The adoption of generative AI is reshaping higher education, particularly in the areas of teaching and learning. This study examines the perspectives of management educators' on the use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT), in Finnish universities of applied sciences. Based on qualitative interviews with 29 educators working in Finnish universities of applied sciences, the findings highlight ethical concerns, data privacy risks, AI benefits, and challenges in balancing automation with human-centered teaching. While educators acknowledge AI's potential to enhance learning, concerns persist regarding its academic integrity, institutional readiness, and literacy. Female and experienced educators express greater ethical apprehensions, while male and early-career educators tend to emphasize AI’s efficiency. This study underscores the need for targeted AI training, institutional policies, and ethical frameworks to guide responsible adoption. Finally, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on equitable and effective AI implementation in education. • Analyzes specifically management educators' views on AI adoption. • Educators express concerns related to AI usage by students. • Differences found in management educators based on gender and experience. • Robust faculty training, clear institutional policies, and ethical guidelines needed. • Human mentorship and interpersonal skills remain essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Management Education
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101274
Citations
3
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding management educators’ perspectives on AI adoption: A qualitative study

Zehra Binnur Avunduk, Faisal Shahzad, Ahmad Arslan, Zeeshan Ullah
3 citations
The International Journal of Management Education
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
article

Understanding management educators’ perspectives on AI adoption: A qualitative study

Zehra Binnur Avunduk, Faisal Shahzad, Ahmad Arslan, Zeeshan Ullah
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The adoption of generative AI is reshaping higher education, particularly in the areas of teaching and learning. This study examines the perspectives of management educators' on the use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT), in Finnish universities of applied sciences. Based on qualitative interviews with 29 educators working in Finnish universities of applied sciences, the findings highlight ethical concerns, data privacy risks, AI benefits, and challenges in balancing automation with human-centered teaching. While educators acknowledge AI's potential to enhance learning, concerns persist regarding its academic integrity, institutional readiness, and literacy. Female and experienced educators express greater ethical apprehensions, while male and early-career educators tend to emphasize AI’s efficiency. This study underscores the need for targeted AI training, institutional policies, and ethical frameworks to guide responsible adoption. Finally, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on equitable and effective AI implementation in education. • Analyzes specifically management educators' views on AI adoption. • Educators express concerns related to AI usage by students. • Differences found in management educators based on gender and experience. • Robust faculty training, clear institutional policies, and ethical guidelines needed. • Human mentorship and interpersonal skills remain essential.

The International Journal of Management EducationVol. 23(3)
Institute of Business Administration Karachi (PK), Häme University of Applied Sciences (FI), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.