What the Boltzmann Money Game Teaches Us about Statistical Mechanics (and Maybe Economics)
Motivated by discussions with John F. Stanton, this Viewpoint explains why a large class of fair or reversible "money games", i.e., stochastic models of wealth redistribution among agents, lead to steady states described by canonical and microcanonical distributions. The games considered include, for example, games in which more than two agents can be simultaneously involved in money transfers (similarly to many-body collisions in chemical kinetics) and in which amounts transferred between agents are random. At the same time, money games that break time reversal symmetry can also lead to canonical/microcanonical distributions, as illustrated by an explicit example.
Authors
- Dmitrii E. Makarov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8421-1846)
Institutions
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c02426
- Primary Topic
- Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00