Follow-up study after four years shows reduced deterrence effect of pingers on harbour porpoises in Norwegian gillnet fishery

We report results from follow-up field trials testing acoustic deterrents (pingers) as a measure to reduce harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) by-catch rates in coastal gillnet fisheries in Norway. Twelve gillnet fishers conducted a total of 308 fishing trips, fishing with and without pingers in alternating weeks between January and April 2024. Harbour porpoises were by-caught in both pingered (9 porpoises) and control nets (25 porpoises), with most (~73%) taken in control nets. Average by-catch rates were calculated using a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) approach. The average harbour porpoise by-catch rate was estimated at 0.061 (95% CI 0.034 – 0.098) porpoises per net km day in control nets and 0.031 (95% CI 0.011 – 0.060) porpoises per net km day in pingered nets. This shows that the by-catch rate in pingered nets was about 50% lower than in control nets (95% CI 0 – 83%). This estimate is lower (i.e. the pinger effect size is smaller) than a directly comparable study (Moan & Bjørge, 2023). Possible causes include limited sample size, the use of bait bags to attach pingers to the nets, reporting biases, and/or desensitisation/habituation of porpoises to the pinger sounds. Extra time use due to pingers was low, about two minutes per haul. The use of bait bags seems to have mitigated some, but not all the practical issues reported earlier. The pooled pinger effect size estimate using data from both Moan and Bjørge (2023) and the present study, was estimated at 72% (95% CI 44 – 89%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAMMCO Scientific Publications
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7557/3.8004
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow-up study after four years shows reduced deterrence effect of pingers on harbour porpoises in Norwegian gillnet fishery

Arne Bjørge, André Moan
NAMMCO Scientific Publications
Marine animal studies overview
article

Follow-up study after four years shows reduced deterrence effect of pingers on harbour porpoises in Norwegian gillnet fishery

Arne Bjørge, André Moan
article en

Abstract

We report results from follow-up field trials testing acoustic deterrents (pingers) as a measure to reduce harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) by-catch rates in coastal gillnet fisheries in Norway. Twelve gillnet fishers conducted a total of 308 fishing trips, fishing with and without pingers in alternating weeks between January and April 2024. Harbour porpoises were by-caught in both pingered (9 porpoises) and control nets (25 porpoises), with most (~73%) taken in control nets. Average by-catch rates were calculated using a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) approach. The average harbour porpoise by-catch rate was estimated at 0.061 (95% CI 0.034 – 0.098) porpoises per net km day in control nets and 0.031 (95% CI 0.011 – 0.060) porpoises per net km day in pingered nets. This shows that the by-catch rate in pingered nets was about 50% lower than in control nets (95% CI 0 – 83%). This estimate is lower (i.e. the pinger effect size is smaller) than a directly comparable study (Moan & Bjørge, 2023). Possible causes include limited sample size, the use of bait bags to attach pingers to the nets, reporting biases, and/or desensitisation/habituation of porpoises to the pinger sounds. Extra time use due to pingers was low, about two minutes per haul. The use of bait bags seems to have mitigated some, but not all the practical issues reported earlier. The pooled pinger effect size estimate using data from both Moan and Bjørge (2023) and the present study, was estimated at 72% (95% CI 44 – 89%).

NAMMCO Scientific PublicationsVol. 14
Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.