Building Anatomy: Rethinking Internal and External Dynamics in Architecture

Conventional frameworks often reduce architectural production to a linear sequence of deterministic technical and managerial stages. This study challenges that paradigm, arguing that such a view overlooks the adaptive, multi-layered, and context-responsive nature of contemporary built environment creation. Grounded in systems theory, biomimicry, and human physiology, a novel “Building Anatomy” model is proposed that treats architectural practice as a living organism. This conceptual framework is first established, and its validity is then tested through a mixed-methods empirical study conducted with 126 Turkish architects, analyzing the continuous feedback loops between internal (e.g., designer identity, team dynamics) and external (e.g., regulations, socio-cultural currents) factors. It was confirmed that the dynamic interaction between these internal and external factors is central to architectural processes. “Systemic dysfunctions” were identified and diagnosed that arise from breakdowns in these metabolic feedback loops, providing empirical evidence for the model’s explanatory power. By offering a systemic lens, this study shifts the focus from a product-centric to a process-oriented view of design. The Building Anatomy model demonstrates its potential for diagnosing “metabolic failures” and redefining the architect’s agency, ultimately advocating for more adaptive, responsive, and resilient architectural outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193461
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Anatomy: Rethinking Internal and External Dynamics in Architecture

Murat Sönmez, Neslihan Efsa Özçelik
Buildings
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Building Anatomy: Rethinking Internal and External Dynamics in Architecture

Murat Sönmez, Neslihan Efsa Özçelik
article en

Abstract

Conventional frameworks often reduce architectural production to a linear sequence of deterministic technical and managerial stages. This study challenges that paradigm, arguing that such a view overlooks the adaptive, multi-layered, and context-responsive nature of contemporary built environment creation. Grounded in systems theory, biomimicry, and human physiology, a novel “Building Anatomy” model is proposed that treats architectural practice as a living organism. This conceptual framework is first established, and its validity is then tested through a mixed-methods empirical study conducted with 126 Turkish architects, analyzing the continuous feedback loops between internal (e.g., designer identity, team dynamics) and external (e.g., regulations, socio-cultural currents) factors. It was confirmed that the dynamic interaction between these internal and external factors is central to architectural processes. “Systemic dysfunctions” were identified and diagnosed that arise from breakdowns in these metabolic feedback loops, providing empirical evidence for the model’s explanatory power. By offering a systemic lens, this study shifts the focus from a product-centric to a process-oriented view of design. The Building Anatomy model demonstrates its potential for diagnosing “metabolic failures” and redefining the architect’s agency, ultimately advocating for more adaptive, responsive, and resilient architectural outcomes.

BuildingsVol. 15(19)
TOBB University of Economics and Technology (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.