Evaluating port and logistics companies using integrated fuzzy MCDM with MM–regret framework

Vietnam’s strategic location in the Asia-Pacific region and its long coastline provide strong potential for port operations and international freight forwarding. Nevertheless, the logistics industry faces declining trade volumes, rising costs, and operational pressures, complicating financial performance evaluation. This study develops a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model integrating Modigliani-Miller and Regret theories with STPF Entropy, STPF CRITIC, and R-VIKOR to assess and rank the financial performance of 13 listed Vietnamese logistics firms from 2020 to 2024. Key financial criteria include EBIT, corporate tax, marginal dividend tax, cost of debt and equity, debt size, and tax rate, with EBIT carrying the highest weight (23.5%). Results show that SGP ranks highest (Q i = 0.001), while MVN, GMD, and PHP rank lowest. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with six other MCDM methods (VIKOR, TOPSIS, MOORA, MICRA, COPRAS, CODAS) confirm the proposed model's robustness, stability, and reliability. Minor fluctuations observed in mid-range firms highlight that operational efficiency and internal capacity are more influential than behavioral factors such as regret avoidance. The standardized Q scale facilitates consistent comparison under uncertainty, providing managers and investors with actionable insights. The model offers a comprehensive and reliable framework for evaluating financial performance in Vietnam’s logistics sector, supporting informed strategic and investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Research
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2025.09.012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating port and logistics companies using integrated fuzzy MCDM with MM–regret framework

Chia‐Nan Wang, Truong Thanh-Tam, Doan Tu Uyen
1 citations
Journal of Engineering Research
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Evaluating port and logistics companies using integrated fuzzy MCDM with MM–regret framework

Chia‐Nan Wang, Truong Thanh-Tam, Doan Tu Uyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vietnam’s strategic location in the Asia-Pacific region and its long coastline provide strong potential for port operations and international freight forwarding. Nevertheless, the logistics industry faces declining trade volumes, rising costs, and operational pressures, complicating financial performance evaluation. This study develops a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model integrating Modigliani-Miller and Regret theories with STPF Entropy, STPF CRITIC, and R-VIKOR to assess and rank the financial performance of 13 listed Vietnamese logistics firms from 2020 to 2024. Key financial criteria include EBIT, corporate tax, marginal dividend tax, cost of debt and equity, debt size, and tax rate, with EBIT carrying the highest weight (23.5%). Results show that SGP ranks highest (Q i = 0.001), while MVN, GMD, and PHP rank lowest. Sensitivity and comparative analyses with six other MCDM methods (VIKOR, TOPSIS, MOORA, MICRA, COPRAS, CODAS) confirm the proposed model's robustness, stability, and reliability. Minor fluctuations observed in mid-range firms highlight that operational efficiency and internal capacity are more influential than behavioral factors such as regret avoidance. The standardized Q scale facilitates consistent comparison under uncertainty, providing managers and investors with actionable insights. The model offers a comprehensive and reliable framework for evaluating financial performance in Vietnam’s logistics sector, supporting informed strategic and investment decisions.

Journal of Engineering ResearchVol. 14(1)
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.