Flux and Fouling Behavior of Graphene Oxide-Polyphenylsulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating ZIF-67/ZIF-8 Fillers

Wider adoption of membrane technology is hindered by fouling and flux/rejection challenges. Recent practice in mitigating these is to incorporate hydrophilic and porous fillers. Herein the addition of hydrophilic graphene oxide (GO) in conjunction with porous mixed ZIFs (ZIF-67/ZIF-8) crystallites were used as inorganic fillers in the preparation of polyphenylenesulfone (PPSU) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. The morphology of the resultant composite membranes was assessed using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) whilst surface hydrophilicity through water contact angle. The pure water flux (PWF) and membrane permeability were found to increase with increasing filler content. This was attributed to the combined hydrophilicity of GO and porous structure of the ZIF materials because of increasing alternative water pathways in the membrane matrix with increasing filler content. Furthermore, the increase in the ZIF component led to increasing bovine serum albumin (BSA) fouling resistance as demonstrated by increasing fouling recovery ratio (FRR). The dye rejection was due to a combination of electrostatic interaction between the fillers and the dyes as well as size exclusion. The chemical interactions between the ZIFs and the dyes resulted in slightly different rejection profiles for the smaller dyes, the cationic methylene blue being rejected less efficiently than the anionic methyl orange, potentially leading to their separation. The larger anionic dye, Congo red was rejected predominately through size exclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Membranes
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15100289
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flux and Fouling Behavior of Graphene Oxide-Polyphenylsulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating ZIF-67/ZIF-8 Fillers

Thollwana Andretta Makhetha, Philiswa N. Nomngongo, Azile Nqombolo, Richard M. Moutloali
2 citations
Membranes
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
article

Flux and Fouling Behavior of Graphene Oxide-Polyphenylsulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating ZIF-67/ZIF-8 Fillers

Thollwana Andretta Makhetha, Philiswa N. Nomngongo, Azile Nqombolo, Richard M. Moutloali
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wider adoption of membrane technology is hindered by fouling and flux/rejection challenges. Recent practice in mitigating these is to incorporate hydrophilic and porous fillers. Herein the addition of hydrophilic graphene oxide (GO) in conjunction with porous mixed ZIFs (ZIF-67/ZIF-8) crystallites were used as inorganic fillers in the preparation of polyphenylenesulfone (PPSU) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. The morphology of the resultant composite membranes was assessed using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) whilst surface hydrophilicity through water contact angle. The pure water flux (PWF) and membrane permeability were found to increase with increasing filler content. This was attributed to the combined hydrophilicity of GO and porous structure of the ZIF materials because of increasing alternative water pathways in the membrane matrix with increasing filler content. Furthermore, the increase in the ZIF component led to increasing bovine serum albumin (BSA) fouling resistance as demonstrated by increasing fouling recovery ratio (FRR). The dye rejection was due to a combination of electrostatic interaction between the fillers and the dyes as well as size exclusion. The chemical interactions between the ZIFs and the dyes resulted in slightly different rejection profiles for the smaller dyes, the cationic methylene blue being rejected less efficiently than the anionic methyl orange, potentially leading to their separation. The larger anionic dye, Congo red was rejected predominately through size exclusion.

MembranesVol. 15(10)
University of Fort Hare (ZA), University of South Africa (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), National Research Foundation (ZA)
Mintek, National Research Foundation, University of Johannesburg, Nanotechnology Innovation Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.