Fish trawling and climate perturbations threaten the largest marine mercury sink
Global seafood demand is increasing while oceans continue to receive substantial anthropogenic mercury, heightening concerns about the toxic methylmercury bioaccumulation in seafood. Presently, the fate of mercury in the ocean remains uncertain, hindering comprehensive assessments of marine mercury dynamics and seafood safety. Here we leverage an observation-driven dataset to demonstrate that approximately $${1{,}290}_{-400}^{+680}\,{\rm{Mg}}$$ of mercury is buried annually in continental shelves, substantially reducing its bioaccumulation potential in marine food webs. This flux is sixfold greater than that in the United Nations Environment Programme’s last report and twofold to sevenfold that of deep-sea sediment burial, making continental shelves the largest marine mercury sinks. Since industrialization, mercury levels in surface shelf sediments have tripled, indicating that most buried mercury is of anthropogenic origin. However, this sink is increasingly threatened by climate-related processes, bottom trawling and dredging, which physically remobilize mercury through diffusion, stirring, redistribution and off-shelf transport. Empirical extrapolations suggest that ongoing trawling, dredging and warming may transform coastal sediments from mercury sinks to net sources. This shift may have already occurred in parts of Europe’s shelves, though additional verification is required. Our findings highlight the urgent need to reduce anthropogenic mercury and greenhouse gas emissions and balance fishery demand with ecosystem conservation to sustain these critical mercury sinks. Continental shelves have become a substantial sink of anthropogenic mercury since the onset of the Industrial Revolution. However, human activities and climate-related processes can remobilize mercury-bearing sediment, potentially transforming this mercury sink into a marine source.
Authors
- Thomas S. Bianchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-2933)
- Robert P. Mason (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-4931)
- Guofeng Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-5399)
- Dongqiang Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-5522)
- Мaodian Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-0334)
- Peter A. Raymond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-7860)
- Taylor Maavara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-9262)
- Qianru Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0376-2858)
- Xiaolong Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-295X)
- Junjie Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-0255)
- Xuejun Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9990-1391)
- Chengzhen Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-775X)
- Hehao Qin
Institutions
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Peking University (CN)
- Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01642-5
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.60