Bilingualism as a Category of Cultural Philosophical Analysis

Introduction. The increasing prevalence of bilingualism worldwide is associated with ongoing globalization, heightened intercultural exchange, and migration processes driven by diverse factors. A cultural-philosophical analysis of bilingualism offers a means to evaluate its influence on culture, identity, and intercultural communication. Furthermore, it facilitates the utilization of empirical data to investigate the interrelationship between language, culture, social structures, and cognitive processes. Methodology and sources . This study aims to elucidate the concept of bilingualism within the framework of the philosophy of culture. To this end, investigations of bilingualism across linguistics, philosophy, and cultural studies were analyzed using content analysis, meta-analysis, and a narrative approach. The methodological basis of this research rests upon principles derived from existential analysis, hermeneutics, and critical theory. Results and discussion . The analysis of prior research on bilingualism within linguistics reveals the absence of a unified theory. This is evidenced by a lack of consensus on fundamental definitions pertaining to key concepts, such as bilingualism itself, codeswitching, and code-mixing. It is posited that existing classifications of bilingualism are more appropriate to consider as typologizations, given the observed overlap and non-dichotomous nature of the identified types. While the study of bilingualism has historically been confined primarily to linguistics and psychology, with a focus on cognitive processes, language acquisition, and sociolinguistic dimensions, a cultural-philosophical approach allows for transcending these boundaries. This perspective enables the consideration of bilingualism as a phenomenon that intersects with fundamental ontological, epistemological, and axiological questions within culture. Conclusion. The concepts of E. Levinas's “Other”, G. Simmel's “Stranger” and Homi K. Bhabha's “hybridity” provide valuable analytical tools for understanding bilingualism as a complex and dynamic sociocultural process intimately linked to the formation of both individual and collective cultural identity. Recognizing the dialogic nature of bilingualism and considering the existential experience of bilinguals opens avenues for exploring the cognitive and sociocultural strategies employed by bicultural individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-4-38-47
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilingualism as a Category of Cultural Philosophical Analysis

L. S. Moskovchuk, O. N. Gusev
Discourse
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Bilingualism as a Category of Cultural Philosophical Analysis

L. S. Moskovchuk, O. N. Gusev
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The increasing prevalence of bilingualism worldwide is associated with ongoing globalization, heightened intercultural exchange, and migration processes driven by diverse factors. A cultural-philosophical analysis of bilingualism offers a means to evaluate its influence on culture, identity, and intercultural communication. Furthermore, it facilitates the utilization of empirical data to investigate the interrelationship between language, culture, social structures, and cognitive processes. Methodology and sources . This study aims to elucidate the concept of bilingualism within the framework of the philosophy of culture. To this end, investigations of bilingualism across linguistics, philosophy, and cultural studies were analyzed using content analysis, meta-analysis, and a narrative approach. The methodological basis of this research rests upon principles derived from existential analysis, hermeneutics, and critical theory. Results and discussion . The analysis of prior research on bilingualism within linguistics reveals the absence of a unified theory. This is evidenced by a lack of consensus on fundamental definitions pertaining to key concepts, such as bilingualism itself, codeswitching, and code-mixing. It is posited that existing classifications of bilingualism are more appropriate to consider as typologizations, given the observed overlap and non-dichotomous nature of the identified types. While the study of bilingualism has historically been confined primarily to linguistics and psychology, with a focus on cognitive processes, language acquisition, and sociolinguistic dimensions, a cultural-philosophical approach allows for transcending these boundaries. This perspective enables the consideration of bilingualism as a phenomenon that intersects with fundamental ontological, epistemological, and axiological questions within culture. Conclusion. The concepts of E. Levinas's “Other”, G. Simmel's “Stranger” and Homi K. Bhabha's “hybridity” provide valuable analytical tools for understanding bilingualism as a complex and dynamic sociocultural process intimately linked to the formation of both individual and collective cultural identity. Recognizing the dialogic nature of bilingualism and considering the existential experience of bilinguals opens avenues for exploring the cognitive and sociocultural strategies employed by bicultural individuals.

DiscourseVol. 11(4)
Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.