Comparing TiO <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e219" altimg="si1.svg"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and CuO nanoparticles as additives to impro

This study evaluates the effects of TiO 2 and CuO nanoparticles as additives to a 15% n-butanol-diesel blend (BuD) on the performance and emissions of a four-stroke diesel engine. Tests at varying torque loads revealed that while n-butanol blending alone increased fuel consumption and energy use compared to pure diesel, the addition of 50 ppm TiO 2 or CuO nanoparticles significantly mitigated these drawbacks, enhancing fuel efficiency and ignition quality. Key emission pollutants—CO, HC, and particulate matter—were notably reduced with nanoparticles, attributed to their catalytic and oxygen-supplying roles promoting more complete combustion. However, NOx emissions increased with n-butanol and nanoparticle use, highlighting a trade-off that needs further mitigation strategies. This work uniquely compares TiO 2 and CuO nanoparticles under identical conditions, providing new insights into their differential catalytic effects on butanol-diesel combustion and emissions. The findings support TiO 2 and CuO as cost-effective additives to optimize biofuel blends for cleaner and more efficient engine operation. • TiO 2 & CuO NPs improve n-butanol-diesel blend (BuD) engine efficiency. • NPs reduce BSFC increase from butanol, enhancing fuel consumption. • At 2 N.m, BuDTi & BuDCu reduce BSFC by 17% and 13% vs BuD. • Metal oxides’ high surface area boosts BuD fuel’s calorific value. • Study shows NPs optimize BuD for performance and lower emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100278
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing TiO <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e219" altimg="si1.svg"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and CuO nanoparticles as additives to impro

Malik M. Mohammed, Hayder A. Alalwan, Qais Hussein Hassan, Alaa H. Alminshid
3 citations
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
1.55
article

Comparing TiO <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e219" altimg="si1.svg"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and CuO nanoparticles as additives to impro

Malik M. Mohammed, Hayder A. Alalwan, Qais Hussein Hassan, Alaa H. Alminshid
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of TiO 2 and CuO nanoparticles as additives to a 15% n-butanol-diesel blend (BuD) on the performance and emissions of a four-stroke diesel engine. Tests at varying torque loads revealed that while n-butanol blending alone increased fuel consumption and energy use compared to pure diesel, the addition of 50 ppm TiO 2 or CuO nanoparticles significantly mitigated these drawbacks, enhancing fuel efficiency and ignition quality. Key emission pollutants—CO, HC, and particulate matter—were notably reduced with nanoparticles, attributed to their catalytic and oxygen-supplying roles promoting more complete combustion. However, NOx emissions increased with n-butanol and nanoparticle use, highlighting a trade-off that needs further mitigation strategies. This work uniquely compares TiO 2 and CuO nanoparticles under identical conditions, providing new insights into their differential catalytic effects on butanol-diesel combustion and emissions. The findings support TiO 2 and CuO as cost-effective additives to optimize biofuel blends for cleaner and more efficient engine operation. • TiO 2 & CuO NPs improve n-butanol-diesel blend (BuD) engine efficiency. • NPs reduce BSFC increase from butanol, enhancing fuel consumption. • At 2 N.m, BuDTi & BuDCu reduce BSFC by 17% and 13% vs BuD. • Metal oxides’ high surface area boosts BuD fuel’s calorific value. • Study shows NPs optimize BuD for performance and lower emissions.

Green Technologies and SustainabilityVol. 4(2)
Mustansiriyah University (IQ), Middle Technical University (IQ), University of Kerbala (IQ), University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.