Cross-cultural evidence for temporal pessimism about climate change harm

Although people often exhibit temporal comparative optimism—expecting their own future to be better than others’—this pattern reverses when evaluating the natural environment. In this pre-registered brief empirical note, we provide further empirical support for temporal pessimism whereby people anticipate worsening environmental conditions over time, especially for future generations. Using a large cross-cultural sample (k = 110, N = 108,946), we confirmed that people consistently judge climate change as posing a significantly greater harm to future generations than to themselves—a pattern that remained robust after controlling for demographics and multiple comparisons. Exploratory analysis indicated that temporal pessimism was greater among individuals with higher levels of climate worry and in nations with higher GDP per capita, stronger environmental performance, and greater human development, but smaller in nations with higher economic inequality. We discuss the implications of these findings for motivated cognition and climate action.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d8fxm_v1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural evidence for temporal pessimism about climate change harm

Christoph Klebl, Taciano L. Milfont
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Cross-cultural evidence for temporal pessimism about climate change harm

Christoph Klebl, Taciano L. Milfont
article en

Abstract

Although people often exhibit temporal comparative optimism—expecting their own future to be better than others’—this pattern reverses when evaluating the natural environment. In this pre-registered brief empirical note, we provide further empirical support for temporal pessimism whereby people anticipate worsening environmental conditions over time, especially for future generations. Using a large cross-cultural sample (k = 110, N = 108,946), we confirmed that people consistently judge climate change as posing a significantly greater harm to future generations than to themselves—a pattern that remained robust after controlling for demographics and multiple comparisons. Exploratory analysis indicated that temporal pessimism was greater among individuals with higher levels of climate worry and in nations with higher GDP per capita, stronger environmental performance, and greater human development, but smaller in nations with higher economic inequality. We discuss the implications of these findings for motivated cognition and climate action.

Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.