Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of Measures of Physical Performance in Patients with COPD

<b>Background</b>: Assessments of functional capacity require considerable time and space and are thus generally not suitable for home-based assessments. Reproducibility measures from tests evaluating functional capacity suitable for home-based assessment are warranted. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of home-based assessments of the one-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTS), handgrip strength (HGS), and short physical performance battery (SPPB) in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <b>Methods</b>: Fifty patients were recruited from an ongoing RCT study prior to the start of the intervention. All patients performed two 1MSTS attempts with 30 min intervals, three HGS attempts, and one SPPB attempt. The procedure was repeated after 7-10 days by a blinded assessor. <b>Results</b>: Fifty patients (29 females; mean (SD): age 71.3 (±7.7) years, FEV1% predicted 37.4 (±14.1), and COPD assessment test score 19.4 (±6.5) were assessed. The 1MSTS intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC<sub>1.1</sub>) was 0.95 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.91) and classified as excellent; agreement (standard error of measurement, SEM) was 1.7 repetitions. The inter-rater reliability ICC<sub>1.1</sub> for 1MSTS was 0.91 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.84) and SEM 2.5 repetitions; for HGS it was ICC<sub>1.1</sub> of 0.84 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.74) and SEM 4.2 kg; for SPPB it was ICC<sub>1.1</sub> of 0.86 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.77) and SEM 0.9 points, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reproducibility of home-based assessment with 1MSTS, HGS, and SPPB in patients with moderate to very severe COPD showed good to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and acceptable agreement below the established minimal important change. These findings support the utility and feasibility of these tests as reliable outcome measures in clinical practice and their applicability in home-based settings enabling functional assessments of patients with transportation challenges and mobility limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196755
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of Measures of Physical Performance in Patients with COPD

Henrik Hansen, Stig Mølsted, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Nina Godtfredsen et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of Measures of Physical Performance in Patients with COPD

Henrik Hansen, Stig Mølsted, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Nina Godtfredsen, Christina Nielsen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Assessments of functional capacity require considerable time and space and are thus generally not suitable for home-based assessments. Reproducibility measures from tests evaluating functional capacity suitable for home-based assessment are warranted. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of home-based assessments of the one-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTS), handgrip strength (HGS), and short physical performance battery (SPPB) in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <b>Methods</b>: Fifty patients were recruited from an ongoing RCT study prior to the start of the intervention. All patients performed two 1MSTS attempts with 30 min intervals, three HGS attempts, and one SPPB attempt. The procedure was repeated after 7-10 days by a blinded assessor. <b>Results</b>: Fifty patients (29 females; mean (SD): age 71.3 (±7.7) years, FEV1% predicted 37.4 (±14.1), and COPD assessment test score 19.4 (±6.5) were assessed. The 1MSTS intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC<sub>1.1</sub>) was 0.95 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.91) and classified as excellent; agreement (standard error of measurement, SEM) was 1.7 repetitions. The inter-rater reliability ICC<sub>1.1</sub> for 1MSTS was 0.91 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.84) and SEM 2.5 repetitions; for HGS it was ICC<sub>1.1</sub> of 0.84 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.74) and SEM 4.2 kg; for SPPB it was ICC<sub>1.1</sub> of 0.86 (lower limit 95% CI: 0.77) and SEM 0.9 points, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reproducibility of home-based assessment with 1MSTS, HGS, and SPPB in patients with moderate to very severe COPD showed good to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and acceptable agreement below the established minimal important change. These findings support the utility and feasibility of these tests as reliable outcome measures in clinical practice and their applicability in home-based settings enabling functional assessments of patients with transportation challenges and mobility limitations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Antwerp (BE), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Province of Antwerp (BE)
Jascha Fonden, Gentofte Hospital, TrygFonden, Hvidovre Hospital, H. Lundbeck A/S, Bispebjerg Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.