Analysis of referrals for phimosis to specialist care: What happens next?

Introduction: referrals for pediatric surgery consultation due to phimosis are relatively common. They generate a significant volume of patients that need to be seen at the hospital. As the current approach to the management of physiological asymptomatic phimosis is conservative, we set out to analyze the characteristics of these referrals and their outcomes. Methods: we reviewed a random sample of referrals to pediatric surgery consultation for phimosis between 2019 and 2022. We analyzed patient characteristics, the reasons for referral and the outcomes of the consultation. Results: the sample included a total of 392 referrals. The mean patient age was 5.8 years. Of this total, 40.6% were 4 years old or younger at the time of referral. Seventy-nine percent of de cases were asymptomatic. Twenty-four patients (6.2%) received a diagnosis of lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). Surgery was the approach selected in the initial visit in only 25% of the cases. Discharge or follow-up without active treatment were significantly more likely in children aged less than 6 years. Conclusions: most children referred to pediatric surgery during the study period had asymptomatic physiological phimosis, and surgery was the selected approach in the initial consultation in only a quarter of them. In order to optimize resources and in adherence to current guidelines, we propose improving the education of families and health care professionals, ensuring adequate healthy foreskin care and conservative management of phimosis and limiting referrals for symptomatic cases or those that do not respond to conservative treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60147/2d10de96
Primary Topic
Genital Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of referrals for phimosis to specialist care: What happens next?

Monique Martin, Carme Grande‐Moreillo, Sara Fuentes, Elena Robert et al.
Genital Health and Disease
article

Analysis of referrals for phimosis to specialist care: What happens next?

Monique Martin, Carme Grande‐Moreillo, Sara Fuentes, Elena Robert, Alicia Arranz, Nerea Vicente, Paula Salcedo
article en

Abstract

Introduction: referrals for pediatric surgery consultation due to phimosis are relatively common. They generate a significant volume of patients that need to be seen at the hospital. As the current approach to the management of physiological asymptomatic phimosis is conservative, we set out to analyze the characteristics of these referrals and their outcomes. Methods: we reviewed a random sample of referrals to pediatric surgery consultation for phimosis between 2019 and 2022. We analyzed patient characteristics, the reasons for referral and the outcomes of the consultation. Results: the sample included a total of 392 referrals. The mean patient age was 5.8 years. Of this total, 40.6% were 4 years old or younger at the time of referral. Seventy-nine percent of de cases were asymptomatic. Twenty-four patients (6.2%) received a diagnosis of lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). Surgery was the approach selected in the initial visit in only 25% of the cases. Discharge or follow-up without active treatment were significantly more likely in children aged less than 6 years. Conclusions: most children referred to pediatric surgery during the study period had asymptomatic physiological phimosis, and surgery was the selected approach in the initial consultation in only a quarter of them. In order to optimize resources and in adherence to current guidelines, we propose improving the education of families and health care professionals, ensuring adequate healthy foreskin care and conservative management of phimosis and limiting referrals for symptomatic cases or those that do not respond to conservative treatment.

Vol. 27(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Genital Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.