A comparative study of machine learning models on molecular fingerprints for odor decoding

Understanding how molecular structure relates to odor perception is a longstanding problem, with important implications for fragrance development and sensory science. In this study, we present an advanced comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting fragrance odors, examining both individual descriptor-based models and integrated frameworks. Using a curated dataset of 8681 compounds from ten expert sources, we benchmark functional group fingerprints, classical molecular descriptors, and Morgan structural fingerprints across Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The Morgan-fingerprint-based XGBoost model achieves the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.828, AUPRC 0.237), outperforming descriptor-based models. Our findings highlight the superior representational capacity of molecular fingerprints to capture olfactory cues, not only achieving high predictive performance but also revealing a continuous, interpretable scent space that aligns with perceptual and chemical relationships. This paves the way for data-driven research into olfactory mechanisms, alongside the next generation of in silico odor prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Chemistry
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-025-01651-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of machine learning models on molecular fingerprints for odor decoding

Chunho Park, Yeonju Hong, Jung W. Suh
1 citations
Communications Chemistry
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
article

A comparative study of machine learning models on molecular fingerprints for odor decoding

Chunho Park, Yeonju Hong, Jung W. Suh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding how molecular structure relates to odor perception is a longstanding problem, with important implications for fragrance development and sensory science. In this study, we present an advanced comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting fragrance odors, examining both individual descriptor-based models and integrated frameworks. Using a curated dataset of 8681 compounds from ten expert sources, we benchmark functional group fingerprints, classical molecular descriptors, and Morgan structural fingerprints across Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine. The Morgan-fingerprint-based XGBoost model achieves the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.828, AUPRC 0.237), outperforming descriptor-based models. Our findings highlight the superior representational capacity of molecular fingerprints to capture olfactory cues, not only achieving high predictive performance but also revealing a continuous, interpretable scent space that aligns with perceptual and chemical relationships. This paves the way for data-driven research into olfactory mechanisms, alongside the next generation of in silico odor prediction.

Communications ChemistryVol. 8(1)
Nkmax (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.