An Examination of Distractor Susceptibility of Prioritized and Unprioritized Information in Visual Working Memory

This report presents three behavioral experiments examining how different approaches of attentional prioritization influence distractor susceptibility in visual working memory (WM). We used three prioritization approaches: spontaneous, cued-based, and reward-based. In Experiments 1a and 1b, which involved spontaneous prioritization, we found that the distractor susceptibility of the last memory item - often assumed to be in the focus of attention - did not differ from that of other items in WM. In Experiment 2, cue-based prioritization was associated with reduced distractor susceptibility for the cued item, whereas reward-based prioritization showed no such effect for the highly-rewarded item, regardless of when the priority signal was presented (before, during, or after encoding). Thus, across these three experiments, prioritization was found to either reduce or have no effect on distractor susceptibility, but never to increase it. This dataset provides a basis for further investigation into the interaction between attention and interference in WM under different prioritization approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognition
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.462
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Examination of Distractor Susceptibility of Prioritized and Unprioritized Information in Visual Working Memory

Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock, Evie Vergauwe
1 citations
Journal of Cognition
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

An Examination of Distractor Susceptibility of Prioritized and Unprioritized Information in Visual Working Memory

Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock, Evie Vergauwe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This report presents three behavioral experiments examining how different approaches of attentional prioritization influence distractor susceptibility in visual working memory (WM). We used three prioritization approaches: spontaneous, cued-based, and reward-based. In Experiments 1a and 1b, which involved spontaneous prioritization, we found that the distractor susceptibility of the last memory item - often assumed to be in the focus of attention - did not differ from that of other items in WM. In Experiment 2, cue-based prioritization was associated with reduced distractor susceptibility for the cued item, whereas reward-based prioritization showed no such effect for the highly-rewarded item, regardless of when the priority signal was presented (before, during, or after encoding). Thus, across these three experiments, prioritization was found to either reduce or have no effect on distractor susceptibility, but never to increase it. This dataset provides a basis for further investigation into the interaction between attention and interference in WM under different prioritization approaches.

Journal of CognitionVol. 8(1)
University of Geneva (CH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Examination of Distractor Susceptibility of Prioritized and Unprioritized Information in Visual Working Memory — Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock, et al. · Journal of Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS