Internal validation of an 11-yr prediction model for new vertebral fractures using the vertebral bone quality score: a prospective cohort study

The vertebral bone quality score is used to assess bone quality using magnetic resonance imaging. This study aimed to perform internal validation of a previously developed prediction model for the occurrence of new vertebral fractures (NVFs) over 11 yrs using the vertebral bone quality score. A prospective cohort of 157 participants from the Minami-Aizu study, with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging follow-ups over 11 yrs, was analyzed from an initial 200-participant cohort, applying the exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of NVFs over 11 yrs. The predictors included age, sex, existing vertebral fractures at baseline, and VBQ scores. The prediction model, constructed using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Akaike information criterion, was evaluated for its discrimination power using the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrapping method with model reconstruction through regularization to correct for overfitting. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors with a <i>p</i>-value of <.10 in multiple logistic regression analysis and <.05 in other analyses were considered statistically significant. New vertebral fractures occurred in 29 of the 157 participants. The AUC of the original model was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.92). Bootstrapping revealed overfitting, which led to model reconstruction with regularization. The AUC of the regularized model was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.91), with no significant overfitting. The regularized model showed discrimination power equivalent to that of the original model without overfitting. A prediction model corrected for overfitting may be effective for long-term VF prediction. Future studies should investigate the external validity and clinical impact of the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBMR Plus
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf155
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal validation of an 11-yr prediction model for new vertebral fractures using the vertebral bone quality score: a prospective cohort study

Yoichi Kaneuchi, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Koji Otani et al.
JBMR Plus
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Internal validation of an 11-yr prediction model for new vertebral fractures using the vertebral bone quality score: a prospective cohort study

Yoichi Kaneuchi, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Koji Otani, Takuya Nikaido, Yuji Endo, Takuya Kameda, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Kenji Kobayashi, Takehiro Watanabe, Takeru Yokota, Miho Sekiguchi
article en

Abstract

The vertebral bone quality score is used to assess bone quality using magnetic resonance imaging. This study aimed to perform internal validation of a previously developed prediction model for the occurrence of new vertebral fractures (NVFs) over 11 yrs using the vertebral bone quality score. A prospective cohort of 157 participants from the Minami-Aizu study, with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging follow-ups over 11 yrs, was analyzed from an initial 200-participant cohort, applying the exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of NVFs over 11 yrs. The predictors included age, sex, existing vertebral fractures at baseline, and VBQ scores. The prediction model, constructed using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Akaike information criterion, was evaluated for its discrimination power using the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrapping method with model reconstruction through regularization to correct for overfitting. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors with a <i>p</i>-value of <.10 in multiple logistic regression analysis and <.05 in other analyses were considered statistically significant. New vertebral fractures occurred in 29 of the 157 participants. The AUC of the original model was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.92). Bootstrapping revealed overfitting, which led to model reconstruction with regularization. The AUC of the regularized model was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.91), with no significant overfitting. The regularized model showed discrimination power equivalent to that of the original model without overfitting. A prediction model corrected for overfitting may be effective for long-term VF prediction. Future studies should investigate the external validity and clinical impact of the model.

JBMR PlusVol. 9(11)
Fukushima Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.