The updated Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive and the Climate Variability Diagnostics Package: new tools for the study of climate variability and change

Abstract. Observations can be considered as one realisation of the climate system that we live in. To provide a fair comparison of climate models with observations, one must use multiple realisations or ensemble members from a single model and assess where the observations sit within the ensemble spread. Single model initial-condition large ensembles (LEs) are valuable tools for such an evaluation. Here, we present the new Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive (MMLEAv2) which has been extended to include 18 models and 16 two-dimensional variables. Data in this archive have been remapped to a common 2.5 × 2.5° grid for ease of inter-model comparison. We additionally introduce the newly updated Climate Variability Diagnostics Package version 6 (CVDPv6), which is designed specifically for use with LEs. The CVDPv6 computes and displays the major modes of climate variability as well as long-term trends and climatologies in models and observations based on a variety of fields. This tool creates plots of both individual ensemble members, and the ensemble mean of each LE, including observational rank plots, pattern correlations, and root mean square difference metrics displayed in both graphical and statistical output that is saved to a data repository. By applying the CVDPv6 to the MMLEAv2, we highlight its use for model evaluation against observations and for model intercomparisons. We demonstrate that for highly variable metrics a model might evaluate poorly or favourably compared to the single realisation the observations represent, depending on the chosen ensemble member. This behaviour emphasises that LEs provide a much fairer model evaluation than a single ensemble member, ensemble mean, or multi-model mean. By leveraging the combination of the CVDPv6 and MMLEAv2 presented in this paper we can determine which climate variables need a LE for fair assessment against observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6341-2025
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The updated Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive and the Climate Variability Diagnostics Package: new tools for the study of climate variability and change

Flavio Lehner, Clara Deser, Nicola Maher, Lukas Brunner et al.
7 citations
Geoscientific model development
Climate variability and models
7.74
article

The updated Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive and the Climate Variability Diagnostics Package: new tools for the study of climate variability and change

Flavio Lehner, Clara Deser, Nicola Maher, Lukas Brunner, Adam S. Phillips, Robert C. J. Wills, Urs Beyerle, Julie M. Caron, John Fasullo, Jemma Jeffree
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Observations can be considered as one realisation of the climate system that we live in. To provide a fair comparison of climate models with observations, one must use multiple realisations or ensemble members from a single model and assess where the observations sit within the ensemble spread. Single model initial-condition large ensembles (LEs) are valuable tools for such an evaluation. Here, we present the new Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive (MMLEAv2) which has been extended to include 18 models and 16 two-dimensional variables. Data in this archive have been remapped to a common 2.5 × 2.5° grid for ease of inter-model comparison. We additionally introduce the newly updated Climate Variability Diagnostics Package version 6 (CVDPv6), which is designed specifically for use with LEs. The CVDPv6 computes and displays the major modes of climate variability as well as long-term trends and climatologies in models and observations based on a variety of fields. This tool creates plots of both individual ensemble members, and the ensemble mean of each LE, including observational rank plots, pattern correlations, and root mean square difference metrics displayed in both graphical and statistical output that is saved to a data repository. By applying the CVDPv6 to the MMLEAv2, we highlight its use for model evaluation against observations and for model intercomparisons. We demonstrate that for highly variable metrics a model might evaluate poorly or favourably compared to the single realisation the observations represent, depending on the chosen ensemble member. This behaviour emphasises that LEs provide a much fairer model evaluation than a single ensemble member, ensemble mean, or multi-model mean. By leveraging the combination of the CVDPv6 and MMLEAv2 presented in this paper we can determine which climate variables need a LE for fair assessment against observations.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(18)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Australian National University (AU), Universität Hamburg (DE), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Cornell University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Sustainability Institute (ZA), NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate variability and models
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.