Ecosystem Selection Criteria and Implications: A Conjoint Experiment of Ecosystem Partners’ Decision-Making

Abstract The business ecosystem literature suggests that orchestrators must attract partners by offering a competitive partner value proposition (PVP). Despite the importance of attracting sufficient partners, PVP elements have only been viewed through the orchestrator’s lens. No study has addressed the decision process of partners or asked how they choose an ecosystem with which to cooperate. We address this gap through a choice-based conjoint analysis based on actual screening decisions of partner facilities in German sports aggregation ecosystems. We explore partner preferences and the attributes that constitute their decisions, documenting obstacles to ecosystem thinking, heterogeneous preferences among partners, and the need for a more differentiated view of ecosystem network effects. Our findings contribute to the understanding of partners’ decision processes and have implications for orchestrators in developing competitive PVPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00227-4
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecosystem Selection Criteria and Implications: A Conjoint Experiment of Ecosystem Partners’ Decision-Making

Maximilian Julius Krome
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Ecosystem Selection Criteria and Implications: A Conjoint Experiment of Ecosystem Partners’ Decision-Making

Maximilian Julius Krome
article en

Abstract

Abstract The business ecosystem literature suggests that orchestrators must attract partners by offering a competitive partner value proposition (PVP). Despite the importance of attracting sufficient partners, PVP elements have only been viewed through the orchestrator’s lens. No study has addressed the decision process of partners or asked how they choose an ecosystem with which to cooperate. We address this gap through a choice-based conjoint analysis based on actual screening decisions of partner facilities in German sports aggregation ecosystems. We explore partner preferences and the attributes that constitute their decisions, documenting obstacles to ecosystem thinking, heterogeneous preferences among partners, and the need for a more differentiated view of ecosystem network effects. Our findings contribute to the understanding of partners’ decision processes and have implications for orchestrators in developing competitive PVPs.

Schmalenbach Journal of Business ResearchVol. 77(4)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecosystem Selection Criteria and Implications: A Conjoint Experiment of Ecosystem Partners’ Decision-Making — Maximilian Julius Krome · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS