The Imperial Gaze: Affective Governance, Hybrid Cartography, and China’s U-Shaped Line

This article develops ‘the imperial gaze’ concept to explore how maps not only represent the world, but also do things in geopolitics, even provoking mass demonstrations. It examines China’s early-modern and contemporary maps to highlight how they create an imperial gaze that guides Chinese understandings of world order. If your cartographic ‘view of the world’ produces your ideological ‘worldview’, then it is important to see how China’s early-modern maps inform the PRC’s twenty-first-century claims in the South China Sea. The article argues that Chinese cartography does things in geopolitics by mobilising the affective governance of an assemblage of hybrid combinations of tradition and modernity, East and West, and Sinocentric and Westphalian conceptions of space. In this way, it examines how historical maps of China and contemporary maps of the U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea work with each other to provoke the imperial gaze that celebrates China’s territorial expansion, laments its lost territories, and fights to recover them. It concludes that the imperial gaze is not peculiar to the PRC, thus further comparative research will help to see how it works in other polities as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2025.2562295
Primary Topic
Philippine History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Imperial Gaze: Affective Governance, Hybrid Cartography, and China’s U-Shaped Line

William A. Callahan
Geopolitics
Philippine History and Culture
article

The Imperial Gaze: Affective Governance, Hybrid Cartography, and China’s U-Shaped Line

William A. Callahan
article en

Abstract

This article develops ‘the imperial gaze’ concept to explore how maps not only represent the world, but also do things in geopolitics, even provoking mass demonstrations. It examines China’s early-modern and contemporary maps to highlight how they create an imperial gaze that guides Chinese understandings of world order. If your cartographic ‘view of the world’ produces your ideological ‘worldview’, then it is important to see how China’s early-modern maps inform the PRC’s twenty-first-century claims in the South China Sea. The article argues that Chinese cartography does things in geopolitics by mobilising the affective governance of an assemblage of hybrid combinations of tradition and modernity, East and West, and Sinocentric and Westphalian conceptions of space. In this way, it examines how historical maps of China and contemporary maps of the U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea work with each other to provoke the imperial gaze that celebrates China’s territorial expansion, laments its lost territories, and fights to recover them. It concludes that the imperial gaze is not peculiar to the PRC, thus further comparative research will help to see how it works in other polities as well.

Geopolitics
Singapore Management University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Philippine History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Imperial Gaze: Affective Governance, Hybrid Cartography, and China’s U-Shaped Line — William A. Callahan · Geopolitics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS