Do AI and ESG matter for environmental quality? Evidence from the USA

Purpose This research examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI); environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors; renewable energy consumption (REC) and economic growth (gross domestic product (GDP)) on environmental quality, as measured by the load capacity factor (LCF), in the United States of America (USA). This measure compares ecological biocapacity with the ecological footprint of a country. Design/methodology/approach This study employed novel Wavelet Quantile on Quantile Regression (WQQR) to assess the effect of AI, ESG, REC and GDP on LCF and Wavelet Quantile on Quantile Granger Causality (WQQGC) determine the casual effect. The WQQR technique allows to explore the influence of these variables with respect to multiple quantiles on LCF for time period spanning from January 2011 to December 2022. Findings The WQQR outcomes show the heterogenous effect of AI, ESG, REC and GDP on the environment quality throughout quantiles. Such that AI degrades the environment in short term; however, in the medium to long term, it improves the environment quality. ESG factors have an initial negative impact due to transition costs, a mixed effect in the medium term and a positive effect in the long term. Whereas AI, GDP and REC negatively impact environmental quality in short- and medium-term quantiles due to transitional challenges and industrial expansion, their positive effect becomes more pronounced in the long term. Research limitations/implications The findings suggest practical implications for governments, businesses and stakeholders. The findings inform policymakers how to promote the use of AI and ESG practices that raise environmental quality. Integration of AI and more ESG commitments can assist businesses achieve themselves, improved efficiency and decreased environmental impact. In particular, this study argues that primary importance should be given to increasing the REC so that environmental quality could be enhanced and that more investment in renewable energy infrastructure is required to supply the green technology to promote long-term growth. Originality/value To date, existing studies have not employed advanced econometric methods, such as WQQR and WQQGC, to estimate environmental quality for the USA. Furthermore, this study examines the impact of AI and ESG shocks on environmental quality, utilizing LCF as a proxy, which is an innovative approach to the literature on environmental quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-02-2025-0147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do AI and ESG matter for environmental quality? Evidence from the USA

Mahrukh Khan, Waqar Khalid, Turgut Türsoy, Mumtaz Ali et al.
2 citations
Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

Do AI and ESG matter for environmental quality? Evidence from the USA

Mahrukh Khan, Waqar Khalid, Turgut Türsoy, Mumtaz Ali, Ali Raza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This research examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI); environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors; renewable energy consumption (REC) and economic growth (gross domestic product (GDP)) on environmental quality, as measured by the load capacity factor (LCF), in the United States of America (USA). This measure compares ecological biocapacity with the ecological footprint of a country. Design/methodology/approach This study employed novel Wavelet Quantile on Quantile Regression (WQQR) to assess the effect of AI, ESG, REC and GDP on LCF and Wavelet Quantile on Quantile Granger Causality (WQQGC) determine the casual effect. The WQQR technique allows to explore the influence of these variables with respect to multiple quantiles on LCF for time period spanning from January 2011 to December 2022. Findings The WQQR outcomes show the heterogenous effect of AI, ESG, REC and GDP on the environment quality throughout quantiles. Such that AI degrades the environment in short term; however, in the medium to long term, it improves the environment quality. ESG factors have an initial negative impact due to transition costs, a mixed effect in the medium term and a positive effect in the long term. Whereas AI, GDP and REC negatively impact environmental quality in short- and medium-term quantiles due to transitional challenges and industrial expansion, their positive effect becomes more pronounced in the long term. Research limitations/implications The findings suggest practical implications for governments, businesses and stakeholders. The findings inform policymakers how to promote the use of AI and ESG practices that raise environmental quality. Integration of AI and more ESG commitments can assist businesses achieve themselves, improved efficiency and decreased environmental impact. In particular, this study argues that primary importance should be given to increasing the REC so that environmental quality could be enhanced and that more investment in renewable energy infrastructure is required to supply the green technology to promote long-term growth. Originality/value To date, existing studies have not employed advanced econometric methods, such as WQQR and WQQGC, to estimate environmental quality for the USA. Furthermore, this study examines the impact of AI and ESG shocks on environmental quality, utilizing LCF as a proxy, which is an innovative approach to the literature on environmental quality.

Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal
New College (GB), Institute of Finance and Banking (CN), Near East University (CY), National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.