Validation of the i-Tracker Drug and Total Anti-Drug Antibody CLIA Assays on IDS-iSYS for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Adalimumab- and Infliximab-Treated Patients

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Adalimumab and Infliximab are biologics used to treat autoimmune diseases. Monitoring drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels in patients helps optimize treatment. However, current quantitation methodologies for drug and total (free and drug-bound) ADAs often involve multi-step workflows. Automated systems can streamline the process. The i-Tracker chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA) are cartridge-based kits for quantifying serum levels of drugs such as Adalimumab, Infliximab, and associated ADAs. Herein, we aimed to establish performance characteristics of the i-Tracker Adalimumab, Infliximab, and total ADAs in serum on the random-access analyzer IDS-iSYS and to compare patient results with an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA)-based reference method. <b>Methods</b>: Remnant serum specimens, calibration material, or spiked serum were used to evaluate assay linearity, precision, functional sensitivity, and accuracy on the IDS-iSYS analyzer and to perform the method comparison. <b>Results</b>: The assays displayed linearity, accuracy, and up to 8% imprecision across clinically relevant analyte ranges. Compared to the reference method, the drug assays exhibited a strong linear fit (correlation coefficient > 0.95) with <±1.0 µg/mL mean bias. The total anti-Adalimumab assay demonstrated over 85% qualitative agreement. The total anti-Infliximab assay, however, showed higher detection rate of ADAs in Infliximab-treated patient specimens, yielding < 60% negative agreement with the reference method. Although i-Tracker total ADA assays exhibited drug sensitivity, they still detected ADAs in supratherapeutic drug concentrations. <b>Conclusions</b>: The i-Tracker assays demonstrated robust analytical performance, suggesting potential for clinical application. The method comparison underscored functional differences with the reference method, an important consideration when transitioning assay formats for monitoring Adalimumab- and Infliximab-treated patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the i-Tracker Drug and Total Anti-Drug Antibody CLIA Assays on IDS-iSYS for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Adalimumab- and Infliximab-Treated Patients

Nathan C. Horton, Akpedje Serena Dossou, Michael Seungcheol Kang, Tahira Kalhoro et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.80
article

Validation of the i-Tracker Drug and Total Anti-Drug Antibody CLIA Assays on IDS-iSYS for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Adalimumab- and Infliximab-Treated Patients

Nathan C. Horton, Akpedje Serena Dossou, Michael Seungcheol Kang, Tahira Kalhoro, Eduardo Castro-Echeverry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Adalimumab and Infliximab are biologics used to treat autoimmune diseases. Monitoring drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels in patients helps optimize treatment. However, current quantitation methodologies for drug and total (free and drug-bound) ADAs often involve multi-step workflows. Automated systems can streamline the process. The i-Tracker chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA) are cartridge-based kits for quantifying serum levels of drugs such as Adalimumab, Infliximab, and associated ADAs. Herein, we aimed to establish performance characteristics of the i-Tracker Adalimumab, Infliximab, and total ADAs in serum on the random-access analyzer IDS-iSYS and to compare patient results with an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA)-based reference method. <b>Methods</b>: Remnant serum specimens, calibration material, or spiked serum were used to evaluate assay linearity, precision, functional sensitivity, and accuracy on the IDS-iSYS analyzer and to perform the method comparison. <b>Results</b>: The assays displayed linearity, accuracy, and up to 8% imprecision across clinically relevant analyte ranges. Compared to the reference method, the drug assays exhibited a strong linear fit (correlation coefficient > 0.95) with <±1.0 µg/mL mean bias. The total anti-Adalimumab assay demonstrated over 85% qualitative agreement. The total anti-Infliximab assay, however, showed higher detection rate of ADAs in Infliximab-treated patient specimens, yielding < 60% negative agreement with the reference method. Although i-Tracker total ADA assays exhibited drug sensitivity, they still detected ADAs in supratherapeutic drug concentrations. <b>Conclusions</b>: The i-Tracker assays demonstrated robust analytical performance, suggesting potential for clinical application. The method comparison underscored functional differences with the reference method, an important consideration when transitioning assay formats for monitoring Adalimumab- and Infliximab-treated patients.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(19)
Sonic Healthcare (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.