Relating Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Behavior to Cognitive Functions in Older Adults

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Risk taking, a crucial component of decision-making, is domain-specific. However, most literature has focused on financial risk-taking in relation to cognitive functioning. The current study investigated the association between risk-taking behaviors in five different domains and various cognitive abilities in cognitively normal older adults. <b>Methods</b>: Participants (mean age = 69.55 ± 7.35 years; mean education = 16.69 ± 2.19 years; 58.9% female) completed the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale (DOSPERT), consisting of financial, health, ethical, recreational, and social risk-taking questions. Cognitive performance on associative memory, verbal memory, working memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, and executive function was examined. Linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, and education level were conducted. <b>Results</b>: Two out of five risk-taking domains were associated with various aspects of cognition. <b>Conclusions</b>: Financial risk-aversion was linked to better memory, while health and safety risk-taking was linked to faster processing speed. These findings have practical implications in the context of everyday decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101044
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relating Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Behavior to Cognitive Functions in Older Adults

Preeti Sunderaraman, Silvia Chapman, Jillian L. Joyce, Leah H. Waltrip et al.
Brain Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Relating Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Behavior to Cognitive Functions in Older Adults

Preeti Sunderaraman, Silvia Chapman, Jillian L. Joyce, Leah H. Waltrip, Stephanie Cosentino, Michael R. Kann, Madison Bouchard-Liporto
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Risk taking, a crucial component of decision-making, is domain-specific. However, most literature has focused on financial risk-taking in relation to cognitive functioning. The current study investigated the association between risk-taking behaviors in five different domains and various cognitive abilities in cognitively normal older adults. <b>Methods</b>: Participants (mean age = 69.55 ± 7.35 years; mean education = 16.69 ± 2.19 years; 58.9% female) completed the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale (DOSPERT), consisting of financial, health, ethical, recreational, and social risk-taking questions. Cognitive performance on associative memory, verbal memory, working memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, and executive function was examined. Linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, and education level were conducted. <b>Results</b>: Two out of five risk-taking domains were associated with various aspects of cognition. <b>Conclusions</b>: Financial risk-aversion was linked to better memory, while health and safety risk-taking was linked to faster processing speed. These findings have practical implications in the context of everyday decision making.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(10)
Boston University (US), University of Southern California (US), University of Denver (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Brown University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Butler Hospital (US), Columbia University (US)
Irving Medical Center, Columbia University
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.